Thread Subject: Re: TIA comment to 6-F
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Michele Budris
Date: Tue, Mar 04 2008 10:40 AM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: None
- Previous message in thread: Whitney Quesenbery: "Re: TIA comment to 6-F"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
This has been added to the wiki.
Michele
On Mar 4, 2008, at 10:14 AM, Mike Paciello wrote:
> We can and we will.
>
> Thanks for your efforts.
>
> - Mike
>
> Mike Paciello
> Cell: +1.603.566.7713
>
>
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = [mailto:teitac-
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Brooner Mary-AMB004
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 12:09 PM
> To: TEITAC Committee
> Subject: Re: [teitac-committee] TIA comment to 6-F
>
> agree. Hopefully the EWG can add this knit. thanks, m
>
> Mary Brooner
>
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = [mailto:teitac-
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Gregg Vanderheiden
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 12:04 PM
> To: 'TEITAC Committee'
> Subject: Re: [teitac-committee] TIA comment to 6-F
>
> I think this is fine.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Gregg
> -- ------------------------------
> Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = [mailto:teitac-
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Jasionowski, Tony
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 9:18 AM
> To: TEITAC Committee
> Subject: Re: [teitac-committee] TIA comment to 6-F
>
> Mary, Gregg, TEITAC,
>
> As you know the descriptive header of 6-F was “wideband audio”,
> which Mary/TIA proposed to change to AUDIO CLARITY FOR VoIP.
>
> To further clarify Note 1 Panasonic proposes to add:
>
> “wideband VoIP audio clarity”
>
> So Note 1 will read as:
>
> Note 1: It is [Delete: recommended] [add: suggested]that G.722 or
> equivalent also be provided for [Delete: additional] [Add: wideband
> VoIP audio] clarity.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Tony
>
>
>
> Tony Jasionowski
>
> Senior Group Manager Accessibility
>
> Panasonic Corporation of North America (PNA)
>
> Technology Liaison & Alliances Group (TLAG)
>
> 1E-6
>
> One Panasonic Way
>
> Secaucus, New Jersey 07094
>
> Tel.: 201-348-7777
>
> Fax: 201-348-7807
>
> " = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = " (new)
>
> "www.panasonic.com"
>
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = [mailto:teitac-
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Brooner Mary-AMB004
> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 3:16 PM
> To: TEITAC Committee
> Subject: [teitac-committee] TIA comment to 6-F
>
>
>
> The text for 6-F was discussed in the TEITAC plenary on 2/25 and it
> was left for members to do due diligence on Versions 3 (TIA) and 4
> (GreggV)
>
>
>
> TIA is ok with the text of Version 4, but with two edits to the
> Note 1. copied here
>
>
>
> Version 4 (GreggV)
>
> VoIP telephones and VoIP telephone-emulation software must be able
> to transmit and receive speech that is digitally encoded in the
> manner specified by International Telecommunication Union (ITU)
> Standards G.711.For closed systems, other standards that provide
> equivalent performance may be used if conversion to G.711 at the
> borders of the closed system is supported.
>
> Note 1: It is [Delete: recommended] [add: suggested]that G.722 or
> equivalent also be provided for [Delete: additional] [Add: audio]
> clarity.
>
> Lastly, TIA suggests that the descriptive header for 6-F be changed
> to AUDIO CLARITY FOR VoIP.
>
>
>
> Mary Brooner
>
> TIA representative
>
>
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Whitney Quesenbery: "Re: TIA comment to 6-F"
WebAIM is an initiative of:
