Thread Subject: Re: Rewrite of 21(g)
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Jim Thatcher
Date: Mon, Nov 06 2006 8:30 PM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Sailesh Panchang: "Re: Rewrite of 21(g)"
- Previous message in thread: Barrett, Don: "Re: Rewrite of 21(g)"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
Hi Don,
My writing style was wanting (again). I went through a thought process and
concluded that "D" hit the nail on the head. So I agree with your "vote".
21(g) Applications shall respect user selected contrast and color
selections."
But Don, I didn't understand "Could we include this as a piece added to
21-B?"
Jim
Accessibility Consulting: http://jimthatcher.com/
512-306-0931
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Thatcher [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 8:37 PM
To: 'Barrett, Don'
Subject: RE: [teitac-websoftware] Rewrite of 21(g)
My style was wanting (again). I went through a thought process and concluded
that "D" hit the nail on the head. So I agree with your "vote".
21(g) Applications shall respect user selected contrast and color
selections."
But Don, I didn't understand "Could we include this as a piece added to
21-B?"
Jim
Accessibility Consulting: http://jimthatcher.com/
512-306-0931
- Next message in Thread: Sailesh Panchang: "Re: Rewrite of 21(g)"
- Previous message in Thread: Barrett, Don: "Re: Rewrite of 21(g)"
WebAIM is an initiative of:
