Thread Subject: rewording of 6.3C #1

Return to this mailing list's archives

From: geoff freed
Date: Thu, Jun 28 2007 6:30 AM
Subject: rewording of 6.3C #1

Per Sean's suggestion on yesterday's telecon, here's a stab at
rewording 6.3C, #1:

ORIGINAL WORDING:
6.3C:
1. materials containing prerecorded video and no audio or other
additional time-based content must provide either a separate text
description of the video or provide an additional audio track to
convey the informational content of the video.

PROPOSED REWRITE:
6.3C:
1. materials containing prerecorded video and no original audio or
other additional time-based content must provide either a separate
text description of the video or provide an additional audio track to
convey the informational content of the video.

Note that I just added the word "original" to the first part of the
sentence. Comments?

Thanks.
geoff.

From: Hoffman, Allen
Date: Thu, Jun 28 2007 6:35 AM
Subject: Re: rewording of 6.3C #1

Why are we focusing on "original"?


Allen Hoffman -- = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ; v: 202-447-0303

From: James Elekes
Date: Thu, Jun 28 2007 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: rewording of 6.3C #1

Looks good. From our 6/27 discussion, the word "original" placement
both clarifies and gives beter meaning to provision.

Jim

James J. Elekes, M.Ed, MPA/CPM
Chairman, Telecommunications/Technologies Committee
U.S. Access Board

(O) 888.564.8430

At 07:28 AM 6/28/2007, you wrote:

>Per Sean's suggestion on yesterday's telecon, here's a stab at
>rewording 6.3C, #1:
>
>ORIGINAL WORDING:
>
>6.3C:
>
>1. materials containing prerecorded video and no audio or other
>additional time-based content must provide either a separate text
>description of the video or provide an additional audio track to
>convey the informational content of the video.
>
>PROPOSED REWRITE:
>6.3C:
>
>1. materials containing prerecorded video and no original audio or
>other additional time-based content must provide either a separate
>text description of the video or provide an additional audio track
>to convey the informational content of the video.
>
>
>Note that I just added the word "original" to the first part of the
>sentence. Comments?
>
>
>Thanks.
>
>geoff.
>
>
>

From: Gregg Vanderheiden
Date: Thu, Jun 28 2007 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: rewording of 6.3C #1

Looks good



Needs a good short name though to get people focusing on it right so it
doesn't get misinterpreted



Maybe



Video-only Media



Or



Alternatives for Video-Only Media




Gregg
-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.






_____


From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of geoff freed
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 7:29 AM
To: TEITAC Audio/Video Subcommittee
Subject: [teitac-video] rewording of 6.3C #1



Per Sean's suggestion on yesterday's telecon, here's a stab at rewording
6.3C, #1:



ORIGINAL WORDING:

6.3C:

1. materials containing prerecorded video and no audio or other additional
time-based content must provide either a separate text description of the
video or provide an additional audio track to convey the informational
content of the video.



PROPOSED REWRITE:

6.3C:

1. materials containing prerecorded video and no original audio or other
additional time-based content must provide either a separate text
description of the video or provide an additional audio track to convey the
informational content of the video.



Note that I just added the word "original" to the first part of the
sentence. Comments?



Thanks.

geoff.