Thread Subject: Volume Gain 2.2E - headset exemption advisory note text

Return to this mailing list's archives

From: Brooner Mary-AMB004
Date: Thu, Oct 18 2007 2:45 PM
Subject: Volume Gain 2.2E - headset exemption advisory note text

TIA proposes the following for clarity. Gregg or Diane sent out a draft
earlier this afternoon.
***
Note: Headsets and earphones are not subject to this provision as long
as they use industry standard connectors that allow specialized
headsets, earphones and coupling cables for assistive listening devices
to be used in their place. 3.5mm phone, 2.5mm phone, and RJ-10 are all
examples of industry standard connectors that meet this requirement.

****

Mary Brooner

TIA Representative

From: Karen Peltz Strauss
Date: Thu, Oct 18 2007 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: Volume Gain 2.2E - headset exemptionadvisorynote text

CSD supports this as well.
----- Original Message -----
From: Brenda Battat
To: TEITAC Committee
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: [teitac-committee] Volume Gain 2.2E - headset exemptionadvisorynote text


HLA supports this version



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Brooner Mary-AMB004
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 4:39 PM
To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ; TEITAC Committee
Subject: [teitac-committee] Volume Gain 2.2E - headset exemption advisorynote text


TIA proposes the following for clarity. Gregg or Diane sent out a draft earlier this afternoon.
***
Note: Headsets and earphones are not subject to this provision as long as they use industry standard connectors that allow specialized headsets, earphones and coupling cables for assistive listening devices to be used in their place. 3.5mm phone, 2.5mm phone, and RJ-10 are all examples of industry standard connectors that meet this requirement.

****

Mary Brooner

TIA Representative



------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Brenda Battat
Date: Thu, Oct 18 2007 3:15 PM
Subject: Re: Volume Gain 2.2E - headset exemption advisorynote text

HLA supports this version

From: Gregg Vanderheiden
Date: Fri, Oct 19 2007 12:00 AM
Subject: Re: Volume Gain 2.2E - headset exemption advisorynote text

Subtle change giving more flexibility. Trace Center is OK with this.




Gregg
-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.






_____


From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Brooner
Mary-AMB004
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 3:39 PM
To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ; TEITAC Committee
Subject: [teitac-committee] Volume Gain 2.2E - headset exemption
advisorynote text

TIA proposes the following for clarity. Gregg or Diane sent out a draft
earlier this afternoon.

***

Note: Headsets and earphones are not subject to this provision as long as
they use industry standard connectors that allow specialized headsets,
earphones and coupling cables for assistive listening devices to be used in
their place. 3.5mm phone, 2.5mm phone, and RJ-10 are all examples of
industry standard connectors that meet this requirement.

****

Mary Brooner

TIA Representative

From: Gregg Vanderheiden
Date: Fri, Oct 19 2007 12:05 AM
Subject: Re: Volume Gain 2.2E - headset exemption advisorynote text

Subtle change giving more flexibility. Trace Center is OK with this.




Gregg
-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.






_____


From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Brooner
Mary-AMB004
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 3:39 PM
To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ; TEITAC Committee
Subject: [teitac-committee] Volume Gain 2.2E - headset exemption
advisorynote text

TIA proposes the following for clarity. Gregg or Diane sent out a draft
earlier this afternoon.

***

Note: Headsets and earphones are not subject to this provision as long as
they use industry standard connectors that allow specialized headsets,
earphones and coupling cables for assistive listening devices to be used in
their place. 3.5mm phone, 2.5mm phone, and RJ-10 are all examples of
industry standard connectors that meet this requirement.

****

Mary Brooner

TIA Representative

From: Jim Tobias
Date: Fri, Oct 19 2007 6:00 AM
Subject: Re: Volume Gain 2.2E - headset exemption advisorynote text

Can we ask the TIA folks to weigh in on the correct handset connector name?
Light research indicates that it cannot be "RJ" (for "registered jack")
anything, as it doesn't interface directly with the network, but that it is
commonly known as "RJ-9". The correct name may be "4P4C", but that's
probably going to be more puzzling than anything. We could always say "the
standard handset modular connector" and everyone would know what we meant.


***
Jim Tobias
Inclusive Technologies
+1.732.441.0831 v/tty
+1.908.907.2387 mobile
skype jimtobias




_____

From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 1:58 AM
To: 'TEITAC Committee'; = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Subject: Re: [teitac-committee] Volume Gain 2.2E - headset exemption
advisorynote text



Subtle change giving more flexibility. Trace Center is OK with this.




Gregg
-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.






_____


From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Brooner
Mary-AMB004
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 3:39 PM
To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ; TEITAC Committee
Subject: [teitac-committee] Volume Gain 2.2E - headset exemption
advisorynote text

TIA proposes the following for clarity. Gregg or Diane sent out a draft
earlier this afternoon.

***

Note: Headsets and earphones are not subject to this provision as long as
they use industry standard connectors that allow specialized headsets,
earphones and coupling cables for assistive listening devices to be used in
their place. 3.5mm phone, 2.5mm phone, and RJ-10 are all examples of
industry standard connectors that meet this requirement.

****

Mary Brooner

TIA Representative

From: Jim Tobias
Date: Fri, Oct 19 2007 6:10 AM
Subject: Re: Volume Gain 2.2E - headset exemption advisorynote text

Can we ask the TIA folks to weigh in on the correct handset connector name?
Light research indicates that it cannot be "RJ" (for "registered jack")
anything, as it doesn't interface directly with the network, but that it is
commonly known as "RJ-9". The correct name may be "4P4C", but that's
probably going to be more puzzling than anything. We could always say "the
standard handset modular connector" and everyone would know what we meant.


***
Jim Tobias
Inclusive Technologies
+1.732.441.0831 v/tty
+1.908.907.2387 mobile
skype jimtobias




_____

From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 1:58 AM
To: 'TEITAC Committee'; = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Subject: Re: [teitac-committee] Volume Gain 2.2E - headset exemption
advisorynote text



Subtle change giving more flexibility. Trace Center is OK with this.




Gregg
-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.






_____


From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Brooner
Mary-AMB004
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 3:39 PM
To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ; TEITAC Committee
Subject: [teitac-committee] Volume Gain 2.2E - headset exemption
advisorynote text

TIA proposes the following for clarity. Gregg or Diane sent out a draft
earlier this afternoon.

***

Note: Headsets and earphones are not subject to this provision as long as
they use industry standard connectors that allow specialized headsets,
earphones and coupling cables for assistive listening devices to be used in
their place. 3.5mm phone, 2.5mm phone, and RJ-10 are all examples of
industry standard connectors that meet this requirement.

****

Mary Brooner

TIA Representative

From: Gunnar Hellström
Date: Fri, Oct 19 2007 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: Volume Gain 2.2E - headset exemption advisorynote text

We had a brief discussion in the call about what was the appropriate
standard name for the 4/4 modular connector used for phone handsets.
RJ-9 and RJ-10 was mentioned. I made a brief search and it seems that RJ-9
RJ-10 and RJ-22 are names used for this connector, but I got the impression
that there is no real RJ standard for it. The ordering of the signals in the
4 poles also varies between phones.

Can someone bring light into this area and explain the modular 4/4 connector
used for headsets and handsets and its names so that a proper name can be
selected and it is known what it refers to.

Gunnar
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Gunnar Hellström
Omnitor
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Tel: +46708204288
www.omnitor.se <http://www.omnitor.se/>


_____

From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Gregg
Vanderheiden
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 7:58 AM
To: 'TEITAC Committee'; = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Subject: Re: [teitac-telecom] [teitac-committee] Volume Gain 2.2E - headset
exemption advisorynote text



Subtle change giving more flexibility. Trace Center is OK with this.




Gregg
-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.






_____


From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Brooner
Mary-AMB004
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 3:39 PM
To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ; TEITAC Committee
Subject: [teitac-committee] Volume Gain 2.2E - headset exemption
advisorynote text

TIA proposes the following for clarity. Gregg or Diane sent out a draft
earlier this afternoon.

***

Note: Headsets and earphones are not subject to this provision as long as
they use industry standard connectors that allow specialized headsets,
earphones and coupling cables for assistive listening devices to be used in
their place. 3.5mm phone, 2.5mm phone, and RJ-10 are all examples of
industry standard connectors that meet this requirement.

****

Mary Brooner

TIA Representative



__________ NOD32 2599 (20071017) Information __________

Detta meddelande dr genomsvkt av NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.nod32.com