Thread Subject: Re: Groupingof thecurrent 28software/web standards
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
Return to this mailing list's archives
From: Barrett, Don
Date: Thu, Oct 12 2006 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: Groupingof thecurrent 28software/web standards
Can you get us a free copy to post?
Don Barrett
Section 508 Coordinator
U.S. Department of Education
(202)-205-8245
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Luke
Kowalski
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 4:07 PM
To: TEITAC Web/Software Subcommittee
Subject: Re: [teitac-websoftware] Groupingof thecurrent 28software/web
standards
Should it help.....I have worked on 9241-171 and 151. I jumped in in the
later stages, but things like creating a normative reference to WCAG and
other harmonization efforts were discussed at length.
luke kowalski, CPE
Corporate UI Architect
http://ui.oracle.com
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
650 506 1227
-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Andi
Snow-Weaver
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 12:54 PM
To: TEITAC Web/Software Subcommittee
Subject: Re: [teitac-websoftware] Groupingof thecurrent 28software/web
standards
> Can you recommend anything specific we should look at first in [2]?
> It is pretty extensive and I haven't seen it before; don't want to
> waste my time with dead ends if others have mined it already; any
> recommendations welcome. Thanks.
Yes I do Don. The problem is that some of them you have to pay for. ISO
9241-171 and ANSI HFES 200 are the key software accessibility standards.
Both of these software accessibility standards are harmonized with each
other and considered 1194.21 as they were being developed. I think it
would be helpful to see how the current 1194.21 provisions are addressed
in those standards.
I can provide some information on this early next week.
Andi
From: Luke Kowalski
Date: Thu, Oct 12 2006 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: Groupingof thecurrent 28software/web standards
Should it help.....I have worked on 9241-171 and 151. I jumped in in the later stages, but things like creating a normative reference to WCAG and other harmonization efforts were discussed at length.
luke kowalski, CPE
Corporate UI Architect
http://ui.oracle.com
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
650 506 1227
-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Andi Snow-Weaver
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 12:54 PM
To: TEITAC Web/Software Subcommittee
Subject: Re: [teitac-websoftware] Groupingof thecurrent 28software/web standards
> Can you recommend anything specific we should look at first in [2]?
> It is pretty extensive and I haven't seen it before; don't want to
> waste my time with dead ends if others have mined it already; any
> recommendations welcome. Thanks.
Yes I do Don. The problem is that some of them you have to pay for. ISO
9241-171 and ANSI HFES 200 are the key software accessibility standards.
Both of these software accessibility standards are harmonized with each other and considered 1194.21 as they were being developed. I think it would be helpful to see how the current 1194.21 provisions are addressed in those standards.
I can provide some information on this early next week.
Andi
From: Andi Snow-Weaver
Date: Thu, Oct 12 2006 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: Groupingof thecurrent 28software/web standards
> Can you recommend anything specific we should look at first in [2]? It
> is pretty extensive and I haven't seen it before; don't want to waste my
> time with dead ends if others have mined it already; any recommendations
> welcome. Thanks.
Yes I do Don. The problem is that some of them you have to pay for. ISO
9241-171 and ANSI HFES 200 are the key software accessibility standards.
Both of these software accessibility standards are harmonized with each
other and considered 1194.21 as they were being developed. I think it would
be helpful to see how the current 1194.21 provisions are addressed in those
standards.
I can provide some information on this early next week.
Andi
From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
Date: Fri, Oct 13 2006 12:55 AM
Subject: Re: Groupingof thecurrent 28software/web standards
Nice to meet you again Luke. :-)
I think that here there are at least 3-4 people that are also ISO experts (i'm sure about Jim, me and you... But i can have missed some posts).
----- Messaggio originale -----
Da: "Luke Kowalski"< = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Inviato: 12/10/06 22.06.58
A: "TEITAC Web/Software Subcommittee"< = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Oggetto: Re: [teitac-websoftware]Groupingof thecurrent 28software/web standards
Should it help.....I have worked on 9241-171 and 151. I jumped in in the later stages, but things like creating a normative reference to WCAG and other harmonization efforts were discussed at length.
luke kowalski, CPE
Corporate UI Architect
http://ui.oracle.com
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
650 506 1227
-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Andi Snow-Weaver
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 12:54 PM
To: TEITAC Web/Software Subcommittee
Subject: Re: [teitac-websoftware] Groupingof thecurrent 28software/web standards
> Can you recommend anything specific we should look at first in [2]?
> It is pretty extensive and I haven't seen it before; don't want to
> waste my time with dead ends if others have mined it already; any
> recommendations welcome. Thanks.
Yes I do Don. The problem is that some of them you have to pay for. ISO
9241-171 and ANSI HFES 200 are the key software accessibility standards.
Both of these software accessibility standards are harmonized with each other and considered 1194.21 as they were being developed. I think it would be helpful to see how the current 1194.21 provisions are addressed in those standards.
I can provide some information on this early next week.
Andi
From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
Date: Fri, Oct 13 2006 1:00 AM
Subject: Re: Groupingof thecurrent 28software/web standards
ISO 9241-171 is not yet ended and is under development.
Remember also that is not possible to reproduce more than 10% of an ISO document.
Here in Venice, where i've host the iso experts meeting in february we have work hard for optimization of this document (Luke was here, and Jim was connected via skype and Can confirm this)..
I think that we caretrieve the main principles of this iso.
----- Messaggio originale -----
Da: "Andi Snow-Weaver"< = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Inviato: 12/10/06 21.53.57
A: "TEITAC Web/Software Subcommittee"< = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Oggetto: Re: [teitac-websoftware] Groupingof thecurrent 28software/web standards
> Can you recommend anything specific we should look at first in [2]? It
> is pretty extensive and I haven't seen it before; don't want to waste my
> time with dead ends if others have mined it already; any recommendations
> welcome. Thanks.
Yes I do Don. The problem is that some of them you have to pay for. ISO
9241-171 and ANSI HFES 200 are the key software accessibility standards.
Both of these software accessibility standards are harmonized with each
other and considered 1194.21 as they were being developed. I think it would
be helpful to see how the current 1194.21 provisions are addressed in those
standards.
I can provide some information on this early next week.
Andi
WebAIM is an initiative of:
