1-1-B Low Vision and-or-xx
RESOLUTION from 9-10-2007 Call
.
RESOLUTION 9-10-2007
1.1-B Products must provide at least one mode that allows [access] visually without requiring visual acuity greater than 20/70. This access may be provided directly or through assistive technology.
.
OLD NOTES
Issue with 1.1-B
Comments made during the meeting - not consensus statements (in fact often disputed)
- This was a very large problem in past (screen reader and enlarger)
- Is AT incompatibility out of scope?
- Not an E&IT manufacturers problem - they cant solve it
- Provision is for Purchasing agents and agencies - not for MFGs. therefore needs to be here.
- manufacturers use these too though - so how to separate their responsibility from purchasing responsibility
- should this be a technical provision? (works with both screen reading and enlarging)
- problem if IT works but then new AT breaks AT-IT working together
- more common problem is that users (in gov and out) have older AT and IT only works with latest
- is responsibility of manufacturer to provide?, or to report what is available?, for that particular disability etc.
- the goal is for gov to purchase(or create) products that lead to accessible infrastructure.
- Companies have no responsibility to report things but
- "OR" option would make FPC 1 always satisfy FPC 2. Is there another way to address issue?