E-mail List Archives
Thread: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 139, Issue 6
Number of posts in this thread: 5 (In chronological order)
From: Sarah McManus
Date: Fri, Oct 07 2016 3:13PM
Subject: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 139, Issue 6
No previous message | Next message →
I have a Word doc that passes the Accessibility Checker and follows all the best practices from what I can tell but JAWS 17 will not recognize any of the images. I put in the alt tags but JAWS says, "blank" and skips over it.
Any thoughts?
Sarah McManus, Ph.D.
Director | Digital Learning
Education Services for the Deaf and Blind
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
Raleigh, NC
[P] 919-715-1476
Visit us on the website at www.ncpublicschools.org<;http://www.ncpublicschools.org/>;.
***All e-mail correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law, which may result in monitoring and disclosure to third parties, including law enforcement***
From: WebAIM-Forum < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > on behalf of = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Sent: Friday, October 7, 2016 2:00 PM
To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Subject: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 139, Issue 6
Send WebAIM-Forum mailing list submissions to
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://list.webaim.org/mailman/listinfo/webaim-forum
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
You can reach the person managing the list at
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of WebAIM-Forum digest..."
Visit us on the web at www.ncpublicschools.org. All e-mail correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law, which may result in monitoring and disclosure to third parties, including law enforcement.
From: JP Jamous
Date: Fri, Oct 07 2016 4:10PM
Subject: Re: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 139, Issue 6
← Previous message | Next message →
What version of JAWS? What version of Word? Did you save it as HTML and inspect the image elements?
-----Original Message-----
From: WebAIM-Forum [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Sarah McManus
Sent: Friday, October 7, 2016 4:13 PM
To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 139, Issue 6
I have a Word doc that passes the Accessibility Checker and follows all the best practices from what I can tell but JAWS 17 will not recognize any of the images. I put in the alt tags but JAWS says, "blank" and skips over it.
Any thoughts?
Sarah McManus, Ph.D.
Director | Digital Learning
Education Services for the Deaf and Blind
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
Raleigh, NC
[P] 919-715-1476
Visit us on the website at www.ncpublicschools.org<;http://www.ncpublicschools.org/>;.
***All e-mail correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law, which may result in monitoring and disclosure to third parties, including law enforcement***
From: WebAIM-Forum < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > on behalf of = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Sent: Friday, October 7, 2016 2:00 PM
To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Subject: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 139, Issue 6
Send WebAIM-Forum mailing list submissions to
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://list.webaim.org/mailman/listinfo/webaim-forum
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
You can reach the person managing the list at
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of WebAIM-Forum digest..."
Visit us on the web at www.ncpublicschools.org. All e-mail correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law, which may result in monitoring and disclosure to third parties, including law enforcement.
From: Moore,Michael (Accessibility) (HHSC)
Date: Mon, Oct 10 2016 8:17AM
Subject: Re: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 139, Issue 6
← Previous message | Next message →
It may be that the images have not been placed in line with the text. You can get to the alt text but not in context with the images position on the page. For JAWS 17 you can bring up a list of objects cntrl+shift+o and then navigate to the images.
If you are floating the images to achieve your design you will probably need to convert to PDF - of course right now image alt text is broken in PDF for JAWS 17. It works with all other windows screen readers though. I do not know the status of screen reader support for alt text on other platforms.
Mike Moore
Accessibility Coordinator
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Civil Rights Office
(512) 438-3431 (Office)
-----Original Message-----
From: WebAIM-Forum [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Sarah McManus
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2016 4:13 PM
To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 139, Issue 6
I have a Word doc that passes the Accessibility Checker and follows all the best practices from what I can tell but JAWS 17 will not recognize any of the images. I put in the alt tags but JAWS says, "blank" and skips over it.
Any thoughts?
Sarah McManus, Ph.D.
Director | Digital Learning
Education Services for the Deaf and Blind
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
Raleigh, NC
[P] 919-715-1476
Visit us on the website at www.ncpublicschools.org<;http://www.ncpublicschools.org/>;.
***All e-mail correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law, which may result in monitoring and disclosure to third parties, including law enforcement***
From: WebAIM-Forum < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > on behalf of = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Sent: Friday, October 7, 2016 2:00 PM
To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Subject: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 139, Issue 6
Send WebAIM-Forum mailing list submissions to
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://list.webaim.org/mailman/listinfo/webaim-forum
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
You can reach the person managing the list at
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of WebAIM-Forum digest..."
Visit us on the web at www.ncpublicschools.org. All e-mail correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law, which may result in monitoring and disclosure to third parties, including law enforcement.
From: Emma Duke-Williams
Date: Thu, Oct 27 2016 6:36AM
Subject: Re: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 139, Issue 24
← Previous message | Next message →
Though you could argue as to whether the whole question is relevant to
someone who's severely visually impaired; would it be better to have a
multiple choice, but with 4 samples, and get the student to identify
which one was quartz by feel, as that's the way they'd have to do it
were they in the field - and is probably more equivalent to the rest
of the class going from the visual appearance of the rock, rather than
a complex description.
Of course, then the instructor probably wouldn't want to have diamond
as one of the choices as Cliff had suggested...
Or, give them all a description, if you want them to know particular
properties of the rock, rather than just what it looks like.
Emma
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: ALT text usage for Geology test questions
> (Tyllick,Cliff S (HHSC/DADS))
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:28:30 +0000
> From: "Tyllick,Cliff S (HHSC/DADS)" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
>
>
> Quartz is:
>
> a) the plural of 'quart- in German.
>
> b) a subatomic particle, distinguished in part by its charm.
>
> c) a hard white or colorless mineral consisting of silicon dioxide, found widely in igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary rocks. [The correct answer is always 'c,- right?]
>
> d) All of the above.
>
> e) a) and c), but not b).
>
>
>
> So let's think of how we can present the information in the image as a question, not an answer. (Gee, we're playing alt-Jeopardy! - with apologies to people not familiar with the game show.)
>
>
>
> Here are points I would consider:
>
> · Does anything in the image tell me that the substance is hard? If not, don't use that word. Maybe it has sharp edges, and I can infer from those that it is hard, but I can't 'see- hardness. So if sharp edges is a clue I should be looking for, tell me that they're there-but don't tell me what they mean, because presumably you're testing for that.
>
> · If anyone can tell it's silicon dioxide by looking at it, keep them away from kryptonite! I don't know geology, but I do know X-ray crystallography, and it would take X-ray vision and sophisticated software to tell what elements are in a crystalline substance. So obviously that isn't helpful in the alt text.
>
> · The definition says quartz is 'found widely in igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary rocks.- But is the rock in the image all three of those? Presumably it's mainly one or two. What features would I have to perceive in the image to determine which one-or ones-are present? In the alt text, describe those features-but don't give away the meaning.
>
> · If the image is a chunk of quartz completely isolated from the source rock, how would I know what kind of rock it came from? I assume that I wouldn't. But if there is something telltale that suggests this is quartz from a particular type of rock, describe that feature in the alt text-but don't tell what it means.
>
> · What's the point of the ruler? Yes, I know it establishes scale, but what is that scale? Is the ruler calibrated in millimeters? Centimeters? Sixteenths of an inch? Some other base unit? Then give me that information, as presented by the ruler. In other words, you could say '11.4 mm wide- if the ruler is calibrated to the millimeter, but you couldn't say '11.39 mm wide--so convey significant digits and estimations to the extent that would be standard in this field.
>
> You could do both. What if you set the problem up so the student had to identify quartz from a collection of crystal-forming substances? I'm going out on a limb with my geologic knowledge, so indulge me if the specific examples don't make perfect sense. It's the approach that matters:
>
--
Emma Duke-Williams:
Blog: http://emmadukewilliams.co.uk
Twitter: http://twitter.com/emmadw
From: PIATT, JASON
Date: Thu, Oct 27 2016 6:48AM
Subject: Re: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 139, Issue 24
← Previous message | No next message
Excellent point - and we are going to be exploring that option with the instructor. It will be really interesting to see if they think someone who was blind could id a rock or mineral only by touch (since rock ID involves multiple senses).
Jason
-----------------------
Jason Piatt, M.Ed.
Electronic & Information Technology Manager, Student Accessibility Services
Kent State University
330.672.8032 | = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
http://www.kent.edu/sas
On 10/27/16, 8:36 AM, "WebAIM-Forum on behalf of Emma Duke-Williams" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = on behalf of = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > wrote:
Though you could argue as to whether the whole question is relevant to
someone who's severely visually impaired; would it be better to have a
multiple choice, but with 4 samples, and get the student to identify
which one was quartz by feel, as that's the way they'd have to do it
were they in the field - and is probably more equivalent to the rest
of the class going from the visual appearance of the rock, rather than
a complex description.
Of course, then the instructor probably wouldn't want to have diamond
as one of the choices as Cliff had suggested...
Or, give them all a description, if you want them to know particular
properties of the rock, rather than just what it looks like.
Emma
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: ALT text usage for Geology test questions
> (Tyllick,Cliff S (HHSC/DADS))
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:28:30 +0000
> From: "Tyllick,Cliff S (HHSC/DADS)" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
>
>
> Quartz is:
>
> a) the plural of 'quart- in German.
>
> b) a subatomic particle, distinguished in part by its charm.
>
> c) a hard white or colorless mineral consisting of silicon dioxide, found widely in igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary rocks. [The correct answer is always 'c,- right?]
>
> d) All of the above.
>
> e) a) and c), but not b).
>
>
>
> So let's think of how we can present the information in the image as a question, not an answer. (Gee, we're playing alt-Jeopardy! - with apologies to people not familiar with the game show.)
>
>
>
> Here are points I would consider:
>
> · Does anything in the image tell me that the substance is hard? If not, don't use that word. Maybe it has sharp edges, and I can infer from those that it is hard, but I can't 'see- hardness. So if sharp edges is a clue I should be looking for, tell me that they're there-but don't tell me what they mean, because presumably you're testing for that.
>
> · If anyone can tell it's silicon dioxide by looking at it, keep them away from kryptonite! I don't know geology, but I do know X-ray crystallography, and it would take X-ray vision and sophisticated software to tell what elements are in a crystalline substance. So obviously that isn't helpful in the alt text.
>
> · The definition says quartz is 'found widely in igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary rocks.- But is the rock in the image all three of those? Presumably it's mainly one or two. What features would I have to perceive in the image to determine which one-or ones-are present? In the alt text, describe those features-but don't give away the meaning.
>
> · If the image is a chunk of quartz completely isolated from the source rock, how would I know what kind of rock it came from? I assume that I wouldn't. But if there is something telltale that suggests this is quartz from a particular type of rock, describe that feature in the alt text-but don't tell what it means.
>
> · What's the point of the ruler? Yes, I know it establishes scale, but what is that scale? Is the ruler calibrated in millimeters? Centimeters? Sixteenths of an inch? Some other base unit? Then give me that information, as presented by the ruler. In other words, you could say '11.4 mm wide- if the ruler is calibrated to the millimeter, but you couldn't say '11.39 mm wide--so convey significant digits and estimations to the extent that would be standard in this field.
>
> You could do both. What if you set the problem up so the student had to identify quartz from a collection of crystal-forming substances? I'm going out on a limb with my geologic knowledge, so indulge me if the specific examples don't make perfect sense. It's the approach that matters:
>
--
Emma Duke-Williams:
Blog: http://emmadukewilliams.co.uk
Twitter: http://twitter.com/emmadw