WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Thread: Access Keys - your collective help is urgently requested!

for

Number of posts in this thread: 5 (In chronological order)

From: John Foliot - bytown internet
Date: Fri, Sep 13 2002 5:51AM
Subject: Access Keys - your collective help is urgently requested!
No previous message | Next message →

Pardon the cross posting to members of multiple lists.

A situation has arisen where a large group of institutional developers have
been recommended to implement a series of "Standardized" Access Keys
assigned to "Skip Nav" functionality across multiple web sites . However,
the recommendation came without sufficient research, and unfortunately 2 of
the 3 recommended Access Key commands are "reserved" in a major Adaptive
Technology application. Specifically, they have recommended the use of
"Alt+1" and "Alt+2". Users of IBM's Home Page Reader may recognise these as
being "Alt+1 = Headings Reading Mode" and "Alt+2 = Text View".

It's a mess.

An alternate solution must be developed and implemented immeadiately, and I
volunteered to query this group of informed and involved experts for
possible solutions. Current thinking is to move to "Alt+X", Alt+Y" and
Alt+Z" (Windows terminology - other platforms generally use variants of the
same), but proper research is required before recommending these revisions.
Time is of the essence, so perhaps this group could assist?

Is anyone out there aware of the 3 newly proposed Access Keys being reserved
in any current user application? While the focus is primarily on web
browsing in the broad sense, if there is a conflict with another mainstream
application this information is important as well.

Thanks in advance to all respondees.

JF


----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/


From: Steve Vosloo
Date: Fri, Sep 13 2002 6:09AM
Subject: RE: Access Keys - your collective help is urgently requested!
← Previous message | Next message →

Consider this:

Alt+X = Cut
Alt+Y = Redo
Alt+Z = Undo



> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Foliot - bytown internet
> [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ]
> Sent: 13 September 2002 02:45 PM
> To: Aware-Techniques; Webaim-Forum; = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> Subject: Access Keys - your collective help is urgently requested!
> Importance: High
>
>
> Pardon the cross posting to members of multiple lists.
>
> A situation has arisen where a large group of institutional
> developers have been recommended to implement a series of
> "Standardized" Access Keys assigned to "Skip Nav"
> functionality across multiple web sites . However, the
> recommendation came without sufficient research, and
> unfortunately 2 of the 3 recommended Access Key commands are
> "reserved" in a major Adaptive Technology application.
> Specifically, they have recommended the use of "Alt+1" and
> "Alt+2". Users of IBM's Home Page Reader may recognise these
> as being "Alt+1 = Headings Reading Mode" and "Alt+2 = Text View".
>
> It's a mess.
>
> An alternate solution must be developed and implemented
> immeadiately, and I volunteered to query this group of
> informed and involved experts for possible solutions.
> Current thinking is to move to "Alt+X", Alt+Y" and
> Alt+Z" (Windows terminology - other platforms generally use
> variants of
> Alt+the
> same), but proper research is required before recommending
> these revisions. Time is of the essence, so perhaps this
> group could assist?
>
> Is anyone out there aware of the 3 newly proposed Access Keys
> being reserved in any current user application? While the
> focus is primarily on web browsing in the broad sense, if
> there is a conflict with another mainstream application this
> information is important as well.
>
> Thanks in advance to all respondees.
>
> JF
>
>
> ----
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
> visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
>


----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/


From: John Foliot - bytown internet
Date: Fri, Sep 13 2002 6:21AM
Subject: RE: Access Keys - your collective help is urgently requested!
← Previous message | Next message →

Uhm... in Windows it's:

Ctrl+X = Cut
Ctrl+Y = Redo
Ctrl+Z = Undo

(not Alt+)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Vosloo [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ]
> Sent: September 13, 2002 9:07 AM
> To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> Subject: RE: Access Keys - your collective help is urgently requested!
>
>
> Consider this:
>
> Alt+X = Cut
> Alt+Y = Redo
> Alt+Z = Undo
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John Foliot - bytown internet
> > [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ]
> > Sent: 13 September 2002 02:45 PM
> > To: Aware-Techniques; Webaim-Forum; = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> > Subject: Access Keys - your collective help is urgently requested!
> > Importance: High
> >
> >
> > Pardon the cross posting to members of multiple lists.
> >
> > A situation has arisen where a large group of institutional
> > developers have been recommended to implement a series of
> > "Standardized" Access Keys assigned to "Skip Nav"
> > functionality across multiple web sites . However, the
> > recommendation came without sufficient research, and
> > unfortunately 2 of the 3 recommended Access Key commands are
> > "reserved" in a major Adaptive Technology application.
> > Specifically, they have recommended the use of "Alt+1" and
> > "Alt+2". Users of IBM's Home Page Reader may recognise these
> > as being "Alt+1 = Headings Reading Mode" and "Alt+2 = Text View".
> >
> > It's a mess.
> >
> > An alternate solution must be developed and implemented
> > immeadiately, and I volunteered to query this group of
> > informed and involved experts for possible solutions.
> > Current thinking is to move to "Alt+X", Alt+Y" and
> > Alt+Z" (Windows terminology - other platforms generally use
> > variants of
> > Alt+the
> > same), but proper research is required before recommending
> > these revisions. Time is of the essence, so perhaps this
> > group could assist?
> >
> > Is anyone out there aware of the 3 newly proposed Access Keys
> > being reserved in any current user application? While the
> > focus is primarily on web browsing in the broad sense, if
> > there is a conflict with another mainstream application this
> > information is important as well.
> >
> > Thanks in advance to all respondees.
> >
> > JF
> >
> >
> > ----
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
> > visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
> >
>
>
> ----
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
> visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
>


----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/


From: Steve Vosloo
Date: Fri, Sep 13 2002 6:27AM
Subject: RE: Access Keys - your collective help is urgently requested!
← Previous message | Next message →

Oops - sorry.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Foliot - bytown internet
> [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ]
> Sent: 13 September 2002 03:14 PM
> To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> Subject: RE: Access Keys - your collective help is urgently requested!
>
>
> Uhm... in Windows it's:
>
> Ctrl+X = Cut
> Ctrl+Y = Redo
> Ctrl+Z = Undo
>
> (not Alt+)
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Steve Vosloo [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ]
> > Sent: September 13, 2002 9:07 AM
> > To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> > Subject: RE: Access Keys - your collective help is urgently
> requested!
> >
> >
> > Consider this:
> >
> > Alt+X = Cut
> > Alt+Y = Redo
> > Alt+Z = Undo
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: John Foliot - bytown internet
> > > [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ]
> > > Sent: 13 September 2002 02:45 PM
> > > To: Aware-Techniques; Webaim-Forum; = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> > > Subject: Access Keys - your collective help is urgently requested!
> > > Importance: High
> > >
> > >
> > > Pardon the cross posting to members of multiple lists.
> > >
> > > A situation has arisen where a large group of institutional
> > > developers have been recommended to implement a series of
> > > "Standardized" Access Keys assigned to "Skip Nav"
> > > functionality across multiple web sites . However, the
> > > recommendation came without sufficient research, and
> > > unfortunately 2 of the 3 recommended Access Key commands are
> > > "reserved" in a major Adaptive Technology application.
> > > Specifically, they have recommended the use of "Alt+1" and
> > > "Alt+2". Users of IBM's Home Page Reader may recognise these
> > > as being "Alt+1 = Headings Reading Mode" and "Alt+2 = Text View".
> > >
> > > It's a mess.
> > >
> > > An alternate solution must be developed and implemented
> > > immeadiately, and I volunteered to query this group of
> > > informed and involved experts for possible solutions.
> > > Current thinking is to move to "Alt+X", Alt+Y" and
> > > Alt+Z" (Windows terminology - other platforms generally use
> > > variants of
> > > Alt+the
> > > same), but proper research is required before recommending
> > > these revisions. Time is of the essence, so perhaps this
> > > group could assist?
> > >
> > > Is anyone out there aware of the 3 newly proposed Access Keys
> > > being reserved in any current user application? While the
> > > focus is primarily on web browsing in the broad sense, if
> > > there is a conflict with another mainstream application this
> > > information is important as well.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance to all respondees.
> > >
> > > JF
> > >
> > >
> > > ----
> > > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
> > > visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
> > >
> >
> >
> > ----
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
> > visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
> >
>
>
> ----
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
> visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
>


----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/


From: Mark Rew
Date: Fri, Sep 13 2002 6:27AM
Subject: Re: Access Keys - your collective help is urgently requested!
← Previous message | No next message

On my machine the
alt-x, alt-y, and alt-z do not do anything.
control-x; cut text,
control-z; undo,
control-y; nothing.

I'm using MS-Windows 2000 with Jaws 4.02.
So, I do not have a conflict.

thanks
Mark Rew
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Vosloo" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
To: < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 9:06 AM
Subject: RE: Access Keys - your collective help is urgently requested!


> Consider this:
>
> Alt+X = Cut
> Alt+Y = Redo
> Alt+Z = Undo
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John Foliot - bytown internet
> > [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ]
> > Sent: 13 September 2002 02:45 PM
> > To: Aware-Techniques; Webaim-Forum; = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> > Subject: Access Keys - your collective help is urgently requested!
> > Importance: High
> >
> >
> > Pardon the cross posting to members of multiple lists.
> >
> > A situation has arisen where a large group of institutional
> > developers have been recommended to implement a series of
> > "Standardized" Access Keys assigned to "Skip Nav"
> > functionality across multiple web sites . However, the
> > recommendation came without sufficient research, and
> > unfortunately 2 of the 3 recommended Access Key commands are
> > "reserved" in a major Adaptive Technology application.
> > Specifically, they have recommended the use of "Alt+1" and
> > "Alt+2". Users of IBM's Home Page Reader may recognise these
> > as being "Alt+1 = Headings Reading Mode" and "Alt+2 = Text View".
> >
> > It's a mess.
> >
> > An alternate solution must be developed and implemented
> > immeadiately, and I volunteered to query this group of
> > informed and involved experts for possible solutions.
> > Current thinking is to move to "Alt+X", Alt+Y" and
> > Alt+Z" (Windows terminology - other platforms generally use
> > variants of
> > Alt+the
> > same), but proper research is required before recommending
> > these revisions. Time is of the essence, so perhaps this
> > group could assist?
> >
> > Is anyone out there aware of the 3 newly proposed Access Keys
> > being reserved in any current user application? While the
> > focus is primarily on web browsing in the broad sense, if
> > there is a conflict with another mainstream application this
> > information is important as well.
> >
> > Thanks in advance to all respondees.
> >
> > JF
> >
> >
> > ----
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
> > visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
> >
>
>
> ----
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
> visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
>
>


----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/