E-mail List Archives
Re: Build for the bugs?
From: Steve Faulkner
Date: Feb 23, 2015 3:25AM
- Next message: Bill Tipton (ML): "Tool to list link Names on a web page to Manually Evaluate for SC 2.4.4"
- Previous message: _mallory: "Re: Build for the bugs?"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: _mallory: "Re: Build for the bugs?"
- View all messages in this Thread
If the bugs are due to browser implementations of accessibility
information, suggest filing bugs
http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2014/06/filing-bugs/
Likewise for AT, though the path to doing this is not always so simple.
--
Regards
SteveF
HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>;
On 20 February 2015 at 22:20, Asa Baylus < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> I recently joined this list and have noticed a number of discussions
> surrounding bugs in AT and how to code solutions around these bugs.
> It reminds me of the browser wars.
>
> My question is... Should we be coding for the browser / AT or for the spec?
>
> - Asa
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> > > >
- Next message: Bill Tipton (ML): "Tool to list link Names on a web page to Manually Evaluate for SC 2.4.4"
- Previous message: _mallory: "Re: Build for the bugs?"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: _mallory: "Re: Build for the bugs?"
- View all messages in this Thread