E-mail List Archives
Re: Semantic markup vs CSS styling for emphasis
From: Miriam Frost Jungwirth
Date: Aug 6, 2003 9:09AM
- Next message: jeff newman: "Re: Semantic markup vs CSS styling for emphasis"
- Previous message: Mark Fletcher: "Re: Semantic markup vs CSS styling for emphasis"
- Next message in Thread: jeff newman: "Re: Semantic markup vs CSS styling for emphasis"
- Previous message in Thread: Mark Fletcher: "Re: Semantic markup vs CSS styling for emphasis"
- View all messages in this Thread
Hi Mark,
There isn't a conflict between semantic markup and CSS - you would
simply use em or strong and style them -
for example, in your CSS document -
strong {
font-weight: bold;
text-transform: uppercase;
font-color: red; }
and wherever you use strong you'll get bold, capitalized red text.
Semantic _and_ attractive!
~Miriam
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 09:59 AM, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> Yes, thanks that is a good point. But would you ever just use CSS
> rather
> than EM or Strong?
>
> Cheers
> Mark
----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
- Next message: jeff newman: "Re: Semantic markup vs CSS styling for emphasis"
- Previous message: Mark Fletcher: "Re: Semantic markup vs CSS styling for emphasis"
- Next message in Thread: jeff newman: "Re: Semantic markup vs CSS styling for emphasis"
- Previous message in Thread: Mark Fletcher: "Re: Semantic markup vs CSS styling for emphasis"
- View all messages in this Thread