E-mail List Archives
Re: Bringing accessibility into the development process(request for feedback).
From: Peter Krantz
Date: Apr 16, 2007 9:10AM
- Next message: tedd: "Re: Validation equals Accessibility?"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Validation equals Accessibility?"
- Next message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Bringing accessibility into the developmentprocess (request for feedback)."
- Previous message in Thread: Jon Gunderson: "Re: Bringing accessibility into the development process (request for feedback)."
- View all messages in this Thread
Jon,
Thank's for your reply. I am not sure I completely understand the FAE so
forgive me if some of these assumptions are wrong. Some issues I found
developers to have with online tools in general are:
1. They are online meaning that it takes too much time to test a
single page you are developing.
2. They require manual intervention to do the test (which takes time).
3. They typically provide feedback that you have to be able to
interpret to make use of. E.g. some warnings from the FAE may be
irrelevant but it is hard to know if you don't know accessibility.
Is it possible to integrate FAE with functional testing tools such as Watir,
HTMLUnit or Selenium?
What type of user do you see using the FAE?
Regards,
Peter
On 4/16/07, Jon Gunderson < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
> A tool we are developing at the University of Illinois is trying to go
> beyond traditional accessibility checking and providing additional
> evaluation information on the presence of functional accessibility features.
>
>
- Next message: tedd: "Re: Validation equals Accessibility?"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Validation equals Accessibility?"
- Next message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Bringing accessibility into the developmentprocess (request for feedback)."
- Previous message in Thread: Jon Gunderson: "Re: Bringing accessibility into the development process (request for feedback)."
- View all messages in this Thread