E-mail List Archives
Re: WCAG 2 draft and abbreviations
From: smithj7
Date: Aug 23, 2007 5:20PM
- Next message: Philip Kiff: "Re: WCAG 2 draft and abbreviations"
- Previous message: Moore, Michael: "Re: Navigation lists and headers - best practise?"
- Next message in Thread: Philip Kiff: "Re: WCAG 2 draft and abbreviations"
- Previous message in Thread: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: WCAG 2 draft and abbreviations"
- View all messages in this Thread
Thanks for the great comments. Perhaps providing a combination of these
techniques is the way to go. I could start a glossary of terms,
abbreviations, and acroynms adding to them as new documents arrive and
talk to content folks once it is up to add to it. I will continue with
the print version (even if it is dismissed as our standard), and then I
easily do the semantic changes using a search and replace feature for
both acroynms and abbrebiations using the correct term. Then when
semantic mark up becomes available to speech users that will be
available.
I expectionally like the idea of annonating the minutes for acroynms or
abbreviations. I actually did this when one of the minutes came with a
policy indicating changes using colors (committee of blind vendors - low
vision user). So I wrote notations of additions for speech user and
provided notation at beginning of minutes that I was adding such and
such for deleted text and such and such for added text. I hadn't
thought of doing the same for the acroynms and abbreviations. Thanks
again!
- Next message: Philip Kiff: "Re: WCAG 2 draft and abbreviations"
- Previous message: Moore, Michael: "Re: Navigation lists and headers - best practise?"
- Next message in Thread: Philip Kiff: "Re: WCAG 2 draft and abbreviations"
- Previous message in Thread: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: WCAG 2 draft and abbreviations"
- View all messages in this Thread