E-mail List Archives
Re: accessibility without testing?
From: Steve Green
Date: Mar 13, 2008 9:40AM
- Next message: Tim Harshbarger: "JAWS 9 and the Layout Table Algorithm"
- Previous message: Oscar DeLong: "Re: accessibility without testing?"
- Next message in Thread: Aaron Cannon: "Re: accessibility without testing?"
- Previous message in Thread: Oscar DeLong: "Re: accessibility without testing?"
- View all messages in this Thread
Firstly, testing for compliance with the WCAG only tells you if a website
'should' be accessible. It does not tell you that it 'is' accessible.
Automated tools can only make a decision about 25% of the WCAG checkpoints,
so a significant degree of manual testing would be required to verify WCAG
compliance.
To be sure a site 'is' accessible, you would need to conduct user testing
with the user groups you are concerned about, taking into account the wide
variations in users' level of ability and the various user agents and
assistive tchnologies they use. That is invariably prohibitively expensive.
In short, automated testing, manual testing and user testing provide
increasing levels of confidence that a site is accessible but you can't have
absolute certainty.
Steve
- Next message: Tim Harshbarger: "JAWS 9 and the Layout Table Algorithm"
- Previous message: Oscar DeLong: "Re: accessibility without testing?"
- Next message in Thread: Aaron Cannon: "Re: accessibility without testing?"
- Previous message in Thread: Oscar DeLong: "Re: accessibility without testing?"
- View all messages in this Thread