E-mail List Archives
Re: Testing accessibility
From: Paul Collins
Date: Aug 5, 2008 5:10AM
- Next message: Gareth Dart: "Re: Testing accessibility"
- Previous message: Gareth Dart: "Re: Testing accessibility"
- Next message in Thread: Gareth Dart: "Re: Testing accessibility"
- Previous message in Thread: Gareth Dart: "Re: Testing accessibility"
- View all messages in this Thread
Thanks Gareth,
Yes, you are right about automated testing, but a mixture of both human and
automated is the best way to approach it.
The benefit of Accessibilidad Web is that you can test local sites. Often
when a site is being developed you don't want it available to the outside
world.
Cheers for the link,
Paul
2008/8/5 Gareth Dart < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> I always use WAVE (http://wave.webaim.org/) - this seems to be a similar
> package to the one you link to below.
>
> To spare us all time, you can insert a standard caveat about the
> limitations of automated testing here. On a serious note, though, WAVE
> seems to do aboust as much as an automated solution can.
>
> G
>
>
> Gareth Dart
> Web Developer
> Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)
> 95 Promenade, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire GL50 1HZ
> T 01242 211128 F 01242 211122 W www.hesa.ac.uk
>
>
>
- Next message: Gareth Dart: "Re: Testing accessibility"
- Previous message: Gareth Dart: "Re: Testing accessibility"
- Next message in Thread: Gareth Dart: "Re: Testing accessibility"
- Previous message in Thread: Gareth Dart: "Re: Testing accessibility"
- View all messages in this Thread