E-mail List Archives
Re: WCAG 2.0 'accessibility supported'
From: Rimantas Liubertas
Date: Feb 6, 2009 10:55AM
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: WCAG 2.0 'accessibility supported'"
- Previous message: Randall Pope: "Re: I am looking to purchase form code that has spamblockandis accessible."
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: WCAG 2.0 'accessibility supported'"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick Lauke: "Re: WCAG 2.0 'accessibility supported'"
- View all messages in this Thread
> However, 75% or so of Internet
> users do not have such user agents. Furthermore, they have no way of knowing
> that using a different user agent would allow the text to be resized.
How many of these 75% percent do need text resizing, and how many do know
that this feature exists?
Where did you get this number anyway? Only IE<7 cannot increase text size,
does it have 75% of market share? If one believes net stats all versions of IE
have market share ~67% and IE6 has less than 30%.
Frankly, it is sad to see how this "px is non resizable in IE"
nonsense became the bike-shed of the web
accessibility and way too many just stuck on this overblown "problem"
and won't move on.
As for the WCAG — I'll stuck with WCAG Samurai for a while, thank you very much.
Regards,
Rimantas
--
http://rimantas.com/
http://rimantas.com/
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: WCAG 2.0 'accessibility supported'"
- Previous message: Randall Pope: "Re: I am looking to purchase form code that has spamblockandis accessible."
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: WCAG 2.0 'accessibility supported'"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick Lauke: "Re: WCAG 2.0 'accessibility supported'"
- View all messages in this Thread