E-mail List Archives
Re: WCAG 2.0 'accessibility supported'
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Feb 8, 2009 3:35PM
- Next message: Hoffman, Allen: "Adobe Air accessibility"
- Previous message: Webb, KerryA: "Re: WCAG 2.0 'accessibility supported'"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Webb, KerryA: "Re: WCAG 2.0 'accessibility supported'"
- View all messages in this Thread
Webb, KerryA wrote:
> Basically, I
> think the WCAG 2.0 document is (as Steve says) misconceived and badly
> written, and most people without a keen interest in accessibility will
> find it hard to understand and to implement.
WCAG 2 is hard because it doesn't give black and white, yes / no
guidance and requires actual knowledge of accessibility on the part of
the implementer...but then again, real-life accessibility is not black
and white either.
IMHO, of course.
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
- Next message: Hoffman, Allen: "Adobe Air accessibility"
- Previous message: Webb, KerryA: "Re: WCAG 2.0 'accessibility supported'"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Webb, KerryA: "Re: WCAG 2.0 'accessibility supported'"
- View all messages in this Thread