E-mail List Archives
Re: Tab order for navigation regions
From: Jared Smith
Date: Nov 6, 2009 1:00PM
- Next message: Jared Smith: "Re: mouseover/hover and keyboard accessible expandablemenu?"
- Previous message: ckrugman@sbcglobal.net: "Re: mouseover/hover and keyboard accessible expandablemenu?"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Mark Guisinger: "Tab order for navigation regions"
- View all messages in this Thread
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Mark Guisinger < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> Which of these is better or is there a guideline/standard for accessible tab order?
I'm not aware of any guideline or standard for such a thing. And there
probably isn't one right answer. It does underscore the difficulty in
conveying complex menus (as is being discussed in a parallel thread
right now).
My first thought would be to isolate the primary and secondary
navigation (your option #1), perhaps with indicators that identify
each. I'm not quite sure how the hierarchy of option #2 could be
conveyed to someone that cannot see it, unless a list of primary
navigation items with a nested list for secondary navigation items was
implemented. But this approach would likely be quite difficult to
present visually.
I'm sure there are other opinions or solutions to this.
Jared
- Next message: Jared Smith: "Re: mouseover/hover and keyboard accessible expandablemenu?"
- Previous message: ckrugman@sbcglobal.net: "Re: mouseover/hover and keyboard accessible expandablemenu?"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Mark Guisinger: "Tab order for navigation regions"
- View all messages in this Thread