E-mail List Archives
Re: WCAG 2.0 Compliance criteria for internal or non public websites
From: Margit Link-Rodrigue
Date: Dec 9, 2009 10:33AM
- Next message: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "Re: WCAG 2.0 Compliance criteria for internal or non public websites"
- Previous message: Jennison Mark Asuncion: "new LinkedIn Group focused on mobile/handheld technology accessibility"
- Next message in Thread: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "Re: WCAG 2.0 Compliance criteria for internal or non public websites"
- Previous message in Thread: Moore,Michael (DARS): "Re: WCAG 2.0 Compliance criteria for internal or non public websites"
- View all messages in this Thread
You have to ask yourself what you are trying to achieve. If you want to meet
legal requirements as defined in Section 508, then you have to meet all
success criteria for WCAG 2.0, including 1.1.1 which refers to audio content
and is a Level A requirement.
If you simply want to comply with some company rules and processes (e.g.
CMMI), then your company has to clearly state in your supporting
documentation that you are currently striving for partial compliance and
what your timeline is to achieve full compliance.
It is unethical, in my opinion, if you are trying to award yourself a
compliance seal if you leave out potential future employees/Intranet users
that are hearing impaired. Intranet or not doesn't matter, because the
location of the file is a temporary aspect and the lines between
Intranet/Extranet/Internet usually get blurrier the larger a company grows.
Thanks,
Margit
- Next message: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "Re: WCAG 2.0 Compliance criteria for internal or non public websites"
- Previous message: Jennison Mark Asuncion: "new LinkedIn Group focused on mobile/handheld technology accessibility"
- Next message in Thread: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "Re: WCAG 2.0 Compliance criteria for internal or non public websites"
- Previous message in Thread: Moore,Michael (DARS): "Re: WCAG 2.0 Compliance criteria for internal or non public websites"
- View all messages in this Thread