E-mail List Archives
Re: WCAG 2.0 level A
From: Andrew Kirkpatrick
Date: Dec 12, 2009 9:09PM
- Next message: Wayne Dick: "Re: WCAG 2.0 level A"
- Previous message: Geof Collis: "Re: WCAG 2.0 level A"
- Next message in Thread: Wayne Dick: "Re: WCAG 2.0 level A"
- Previous message in Thread: Geof Collis: "Re: WCAG 2.0 level A"
- View all messages in this Thread
Geoff,
You're making a big assumption I think. I'm not suggesting anything in my question and am certainly not going to detail that any disabilities are "expendable".
You seemed to state that you didn't think that WCAG 2.0 was appropriate and I wanted to hear your thoughts on why. Now it sounds like your concern is whether it is WCAG 2.0 A or AA - is that correct? I'm still interested in your thoughts on this.
Thanks,
AWK
Andrew Kirkpatrick
Senior Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe Systems
<EMAIL REMOVED>
- Next message: Wayne Dick: "Re: WCAG 2.0 level A"
- Previous message: Geof Collis: "Re: WCAG 2.0 level A"
- Next message in Thread: Wayne Dick: "Re: WCAG 2.0 level A"
- Previous message in Thread: Geof Collis: "Re: WCAG 2.0 level A"
- View all messages in this Thread