E-mail List Archives
Re: PDF Accessibility
From: Geof Collis
Date: Jan 20, 2010 5:30AM
- Next message: Karlen Communications: "Re: PDF Accessibility"
- Previous message: Karlen Communications: "Re: PDF Accessibility"
- Next message in Thread: Karlen Communications: "Re: PDF Accessibility"
- Previous message in Thread: Karlen Communications: "Re: PDF Accessibility"
- View all messages in this Thread
I have to ask who are people making pdf's accessible for? I've been
trying to like them but as far as I am concerned it is hopeless.
I have the latest technology and still I cannot read them any better
than I could with my old technology, I only open them in hopes that
one day I will be able to read them effortlessly but that is just not
happening so I fall back to my usual plan and that is to ask them to
be converted to a more accessible format, so I ask why bother in the
first place, I'm sure I'm not the only one doing this.
We have legislation that gives me this option so perhaps Adobe would
do better to make the conversion process better, you cant force
people to drive cars they dont like so why do it with documentation.
cheers
Geof
At 09:16 PM 1/19/2010, you wrote:
>Andrew,
>
>When I downloaded the file (save file as) onto my computer and opened it
>with Acrobat 9 professional it looked like it had tags as well -- not very
>useful tags, but tags nonetheless. I went through about 10 pages and tagged
>it -- it's pretty straightforward, if I'm doing it correctly.
>
>Here is the link I used:
>http://www.usa.gov/webcontent/documents/ssa/SSA_Guide_to_Accessible_PDF_Documents_and_Forms.pdf#4
>
>I didn't realize that Acrobat and reader added tags automatically but
>weren't permanent etc. There is a lot out there about Acrobat that is not
>well known. Can you talk more about that, Andrew?
>
>I'm co-presenting a talk about PDFs & accessibility on Saturday and am going
>to mention this discussion.
>
>Dona
>cedarwaxwing on twitter
>http://accessdp.wordpress.org
>
>On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick < <EMAIL REMOVED> >wrote:
>
> > No, unless I'm looking at a different document, it isn't tagged. Acrobat
> > and Reader will add tags automatically, but they are not permanent and will
> > lack image equivalents and likely have inconsistent semantics.
> >
> > Steve, what URL are you using that you're seeing a tagged file?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > AWK
> >
> > Andrew Kirkpatrick
> >
> > Senior Product Manager, Accessibility
> >
> > Adobe Systems
> >
> > <EMAIL REMOVED>
> >
> >
> >
>
- Next message: Karlen Communications: "Re: PDF Accessibility"
- Previous message: Karlen Communications: "Re: PDF Accessibility"
- Next message in Thread: Karlen Communications: "Re: PDF Accessibility"
- Previous message in Thread: Karlen Communications: "Re: PDF Accessibility"
- View all messages in this Thread