E-mail List Archives
Re: HTML5 and new elements (was Re: Use of SAMP to highlight search results)
From: Jukka K. Korpela
Date: Oct 28, 2010 11:18PM
- Next message: Cliff Tyllick: "Re: HTML5 and new elements (was Re: Use of SAMP to highlight search results)"
- Previous message: Katherine Mancuso: "screenreader feature comparison?"
- Next message in Thread: Cliff Tyllick: "Re: HTML5 and new elements (was Re: Use of SAMP to highlight search results)"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: HTML5 and new elements (was Re: Use of SAMP to highlight search results)"
- View all messages in this Thread
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
>> The good old HTML specifications even said that browsers _must_
>> render EM and STRONG elements differently from each other and from
>> normal text.
>
> All I can find in that regard is this under
> http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/text.html#h-9.2.1
>
> "EM and STRONG are used to indicate emphasis. [...] The presentation
> of phrase elements depends on the user agent. Generally, visual user
> agents present EM text in italics and STRONG text in bold font."
The _good old_ specification is HTML 2.0, which says:
"User agents must render highlighted phrases distinctly from plain text.
Additionally, EM content must be rendered as distinct from STRONG content,
and B content must rendered as distinct from I content."
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html-spec/html-spec_5.html#SEC5.7
--
Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
- Next message: Cliff Tyllick: "Re: HTML5 and new elements (was Re: Use of SAMP to highlight search results)"
- Previous message: Katherine Mancuso: "screenreader feature comparison?"
- Next message in Thread: Cliff Tyllick: "Re: HTML5 and new elements (was Re: Use of SAMP to highlight search results)"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: HTML5 and new elements (was Re: Use of SAMP to highlight search results)"
- View all messages in this Thread