WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: CSS content property and empty image alt values

for

From: Dawn Budge
Date: Dec 10, 2010 8:21AM

Generally yes, anything which is presentational belongs in the CSS. The
only time that becomes a problem is when you need to rely on the image
dimensions for anything and they are not predictable (e.g. CMS-generated
content), or you want content to flow around an image.
Are you trying to achieve a specific thing with using the content
property?

----------------------------------------
From: "steven" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Sent: 10 December 2010 13:11
To: "WebAIM Discussion List" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Subject: SPAM-LOW: Re: [WebAIM] CSS content property and empty image alt
values

Hi Chris,

Imagery to a visual person would generally not need explanation, if it is
purely presentational. Hence why I see the advantage of using CSS for
images
rather than images within the DOM, therefore voiding the need for such
images (and blank alt attributes) to be part of the actual content (in
cases
where images would not be content).

Diagrams would generally be regarded as content and should have alt text,
but I still think icons and banners etc generally are not content, so
wondered if screen readers would extend and honour the presentational
nature
of CSS to make presentational images feasible (after all, XML and HTML5
have
been unable to do this alone, despite being created to divide content from
form and function). I would also remove menus and hyperlinks from content
too if I had my way and introduce a separate browser/app method of
connecting and navigating content, but this continues to be overlooked
whilst browser developers and standards developers work separately.

Regards,

Steven