E-mail List Archives
Re: evaluating accessibility with WCAG 2.0 (Angela French)
From: Andrew Kirkpatrick
Date: Apr 8, 2011 3:03PM
- Next message: Angela French: "Re: evaluating accessibility with WCAG 2.0 (Angela French)"
- Previous message: Andrews, David B B (DEED): "Re: Target Lawsuit"
- Next message in Thread: Angela French: "Re: evaluating accessibility with WCAG 2.0 (Angela French)"
- Previous message in Thread: Karen Sorensen: "Re: evaluating accessibility with WCAG 2.0 (Angela French)"
- View all messages in this Thread
I do agree that this is a best practice, but I don't believe that this rises to the level where it would be required by WCAG 2.0. It is pretty easy to start seeing lists everywhere, but should any time that there is more than one link in a row a ul element be used?
My gut is that, for example, with a list of links at the bottom of a page that there is more benefit from the use of a list for the developer implementing consistent styling than for a user with a disability. I don't know of any study that digs into whether there is a difference for end users but it would be interesting to see.
If people feel that not using a UL element constitutes a failure, please submit it to the WCAG working group and we can debate it and produce an official failure technique if the consensus is that it should be a failure.
Thanks,
AWK
Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe Systems
<EMAIL REMOVED>
http://twitter.com/awkawk
http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
- Next message: Angela French: "Re: evaluating accessibility with WCAG 2.0 (Angela French)"
- Previous message: Andrews, David B B (DEED): "Re: Target Lawsuit"
- Next message in Thread: Angela French: "Re: evaluating accessibility with WCAG 2.0 (Angela French)"
- Previous message in Thread: Karen Sorensen: "Re: evaluating accessibility with WCAG 2.0 (Angela French)"
- View all messages in this Thread