E-mail List Archives
Re: Skip to content links, what is the current best practice?
From: Ney André de Mello Zunino
Date: Jul 4, 2011 2:21PM
- Next message: Devorah Firestone: "Mobile App vs. Mobile Website"
- Previous message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: label element containing input element"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Jeevan Reddy: "Re: Skip to content links, what is the current best practice?"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 30/06/2011 10:57, Birkir R. Gunnarsson wrote:
> So, do you recommend a "skip to content" link for non-screen reader
> keyboard users, or shold it be entirely replaced by sensible us of
> html elements such as headings or landmarks?
From what I have gathered, a solution based on ARIA landmarks[1] is the
way to go. Based on personal experimentation, I have found the use of
ARIA's main landmark role[2] to be both simple and quite effective for
the purpose at hand.
I am not sure though about how long it will take for the "skip to
contents" technique to meet extinction; this is probably connected to
the time it will take for designers and developers to catch up with
ARIA's practices.
To sum up, I'd suggest a solution that employs both techniques, at least
for the time being. The nice thing about ARIA is that it (generally)
won't stand in the way.
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/roles#landmark_roles
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/roles#main
Hope that helps.
Regards,
--
Ney André de Mello Zunino
Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento
Softplan/Poligraph
Sistema da Qualidade Certificado ISO9001:2008
Fone/Fax: 0xx(48) 3027-8000
http://www.softplan.com.br/
- Next message: Devorah Firestone: "Mobile App vs. Mobile Website"
- Previous message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: label element containing input element"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Jeevan Reddy: "Re: Skip to content links, what is the current best practice?"
- View all messages in this Thread