WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: PDF Accessibility

for

From: Pooja.Nahata
Date: Jul 25, 2011 12:51AM

Thanks Bevin for the detailed analysis.

I understand that both these tools have more or less the same
functionality - CommonLook has an edge when it comes to volume, forms,
and tables. But with regards to cost I am not sure if we would greater
ROI with CommonLook than Adobe. With CommonLook - high Cost, less
efforts; Adobe - low cost, more efforts. Also, manual testing is
required in both tools. So, would Adobe be effective from both solution
& cost perspective when we have a set of PDFs with composition 50% Text,
25% Tables, and 25% Forms?

Pooja Nahata | Accessibility Practice Lead
Content & Design Services @ Cognizant Technology Solutions
Vnet: 283170 | Hand Phone: +91-9820725102
LinkedIn: http://in.linkedin.com/in/poojanahata
Twitter: http://twitter.com/Pooja_Nahata