E-mail List Archives
Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast
From: Andrew Kirkpatrick
Date: Nov 21, 2011 9:27AM
- Next message: Lucy Greco: "Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- Previous message: Donald Evans: "Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- Next message in Thread: Lucy Greco: "Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- Previous message in Thread: Donald Evans: "Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- View all messages in this Thread
No - see 1.4.3:
" Incidental: Text or images of text that are part of an inactive user interface component, that are pure decoration, that are not visible to anyone, or that are part of a picture that contains significant other visual content, have no contrast requirement."
Thanks,
AWK
Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe Systems
<EMAIL REMOVED>
http://twitter.com/awkawk
http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
-----Original Message-----
From: <EMAIL REMOVED> [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of Donald Evans
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 11:22 AM
To: WebAIM Discussion List
Subject: [WebAIM] Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast
Do disabled controls (grayed out to indicate disabled) have to meet WCAG SC 1.4.3?
--
Donald F. Evans,
Making Websites Accessible
Senior Accessibility Architect
Deque Systems
Email: <EMAIL REMOVED>
Download FireEyes Free: http://www.deque.com/products/worldspace-fireeyes
<http://www.deque.com>
- Next message: Lucy Greco: "Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- Previous message: Donald Evans: "Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- Next message in Thread: Lucy Greco: "Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- Previous message in Thread: Donald Evans: "Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- View all messages in this Thread