E-mail List Archives
Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast
From: Andrew Kirkpatrick
Date: Nov 21, 2011 9:57AM
- Next message: Jared Smith: "Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- Previous message: Donald Evans: "Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- Next message in Thread: Jared Smith: "Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- Previous message in Thread: Donald Evans: "Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- View all messages in this Thread
Don,
I think that in that situation the user will essentially need to think - "hey, there's a button here but I can't read the text on it like I can other buttons in this app, and I can't seem to click on it either - it must be currently non-functional".
Re: Paul's suggestion, I don't recommend using readonly when the object is an inactive control. Read only and inactive are not equivalent. If the desire is to keep disabled controls in the tab order, then please make that comment to the HTML5 specification so browser vendors will implement the right method. I'm not sure that I agree that disabled controls should be in the tab order - as a sighted user who relies heavily on the keyboard I'd prefer that inactive controls not be in the tab order as it just adds unnecessary tab stops.
Thanks,
AWK
Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe Systems
<EMAIL REMOVED>
http://twitter.com/awkawk
http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
- Next message: Jared Smith: "Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- Previous message: Donald Evans: "Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- Next message in Thread: Jared Smith: "Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- Previous message in Thread: Donald Evans: "Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- View all messages in this Thread