E-mail List Archives
Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast
From: Paul Adam
Date: Nov 21, 2011 10:09AM
- Next message: Donald Evans: "Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- Previous message: Jared Smith: "Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- Next message in Thread: Donald Evans: "Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- Previous message in Thread: Jared Smith: "Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- View all messages in this Thread
Should be able to style the disabled or readonly control to improve the
contrast and still indicate they are not meant for editing by creating a
custom CSS style that looks different than the editable fields.
The semantics of the control's attribute should indicate to AT that it's
disabled or readonly as well.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Jared Smith < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Donald Evans wrote:
>
> > But how is this
> > information conveyed to the low vision magnifier user who can not discern
> > the difference in contrast?
>
> It's the lack of contrast that conveys this information. It seems odd,
> but it's the slight inaccessibility of the control that conveys that
> it is disabled. To maintain high contrast on the control would suggest
> that the control is actionable, thus making it less accessible and
> usable to everybody.
>
> Jared
>
- Next message: Donald Evans: "Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- Previous message: Jared Smith: "Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- Next message in Thread: Donald Evans: "Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- Previous message in Thread: Jared Smith: "Re: Disabled Controls and WCAG Contrast"
- View all messages in this Thread