E-mail List Archives
Re: Maximum number of keystrokes (operations) to get to any item on a webpage?
From: Tim Harshbarger
Date: Dec 19, 2011 6:45AM
- Next message: ckrugman@sbcglobal.net: "Re: "BlindSide""
- Previous message: Mike Moore: "Fwd: Job Openings for DARS Web Accessibility Specialists"
- Next message in Thread: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Maximum number of keystrokes (operations) to get to any item on a webpage?"
- Previous message in Thread: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis: "Re: Maximum number of keystrokes (operations) to get to any item on a webpage?"
- View all messages in this Thread
Another issue with focusing on keystroke counts is that fewer keystrokes does not also mean increased usability.
For example, you could design a membership form for an organization so that every field and choice uses an access key. This would mean you had designed the form with the fewest keystrokes possible. However, someone using a screen reader would have to read through all those fields to find out what the access key is. Even if you provided a list at the top of the page, a screen reader user would still need to read through the list.
I definitely think fewer keystrokes is better than more, but how much is "fewer" probably depends on other things. Just off the top of my head, I would think that "fewer" might depend on the user's expectations on how the interactions should work, how often they need to complete that interaction, and the discoverability of the keystrokes they need to use.
I think it ends up being like most of accessibility and usability--fewer keystrokes is good, but context matters.
Thanks!
Tim
Tim Harshbarger
- Next message: ckrugman@sbcglobal.net: "Re: "BlindSide""
- Previous message: Mike Moore: "Fwd: Job Openings for DARS Web Accessibility Specialists"
- Next message in Thread: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Maximum number of keystrokes (operations) to get to any item on a webpage?"
- Previous message in Thread: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis: "Re: Maximum number of keystrokes (operations) to get to any item on a webpage?"
- View all messages in this Thread