E-mail List Archives
From: Jared Smith
Date: Feb 1, 2012 6:42PM
- Next message: Donald Evans: "Re: Is any use of document.write a violation of WCAG 2.0 1.3.1 (or only if it is used to dynamically create new content after the page has loaded)?"
- Previous message: Glenda Sims: "Is any use of document.write a violation of WCAG 2.0 1.3.1 (or only if it is used to dynamically create new content after the page has loaded)?"
- Next message in Thread: Donald Evans: "Re: Is any use of document.write a violation of WCAG 2.0 1.3.1 (or only if it is used to dynamically create new content after the page has loaded)?"
- Previous message in Thread: Glenda Sims: "Is any use of document.write a violation of WCAG 2.0 1.3.1 (or only if it is used to dynamically create new content after the page has loaded)?"
- View all messages in this Thread
This technique is extremely dated and its recommendations flawed.
There's nothing wrong with using these techniques to write content to
the page so long as the currently focused element is not modified or
removed. These methods are not optimal for generating content, but I
can think of no accessibility issues with using them. Unless I'm
misunderstanding something, you can ignore it.
Jared Smith
WebAIM.org
- Next message: Donald Evans: "Re: Is any use of document.write a violation of WCAG 2.0 1.3.1 (or only if it is used to dynamically create new content after the page has loaded)?"
- Previous message: Glenda Sims: "Is any use of document.write a violation of WCAG 2.0 1.3.1 (or only if it is used to dynamically create new content after the page has loaded)?"
- Next message in Thread: Donald Evans: "Re: Is any use of document.write a violation of WCAG 2.0 1.3.1 (or only if it is used to dynamically create new content after the page has loaded)?"
- Previous message in Thread: Glenda Sims: "Is any use of document.write a violation of WCAG 2.0 1.3.1 (or only if it is used to dynamically create new content after the page has loaded)?"
- View all messages in this Thread