E-mail List Archives
Re: text-only version of web pages
From: Whitney Quesenbery
Date: Jan 30, 2013 9:43AM
- Next message: GF Mueden@: "Re: text-only version of web pages"
- Previous message: Chagnon | PubCom: "Re: text-only version of web pages"
- Next message in Thread: GF Mueden@: "Re: text-only version of web pages"
- Previous message in Thread: Chagnon | PubCom: "Re: text-only version of web pages"
- View all messages in this Thread
I have seen users of all kinds use the "print friendly" page - usually
simply a different stylesheet - to get a distraction-free page.
There's also http://www.readability.com/ which handles many of the large
popular sites. Web site and mobile apps available, with personalization for
font size, column width and contrast.
I've used this when I wanted to test the actual content from different
sites and wanted to remove the confounding differences in presentation.
Whitney
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Patrick H. Lauke < <EMAIL REMOVED> >wrote:
> On 30/01/2013 12:17, GF Mueden@ wrote:
> > I beg to differ. I am set to white on black for poor contrast
> > sensitivity, 200% for poor acuity, often minimize and pull in the
> > margins for limited visual field, and my eyes are sensitive to the glare
> > of graphics, they blind me to any nearby copy. I would love to be able
> > to see many sites on a text only basis. I have no objection to graphics
> > where needed to tell the story, but I do object when it is obvious that
> > the designer is just showing off. When ordering groceries on line, it
> > is not necessary that the list of departments have a graphic
> > incorporated for each department. On the other hand it does help me to
> > recognize the product package.
> >
> > I am not for outlawing graphics, but please give me the choice. The
> > ability to "X out" graphics would be appreciated.
>
> But all of these issues, and how you'd like to consume content, should
> be handled by your user agent, rather than web content authors creating
> separate text-only/limited-graphics versions, no?
>
> P
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
> > re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
> [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
>
> www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
> http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/
> > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
> > > > >
--
Whitney Quesenbery
www.wqusability.com | @whitneyq
Storytelling for User Experience
www.rosenfeldmedia.com/books/storytelling
Global UX: Design and research in a connected world
@globalUX | www.amazon.com/gp/product/012378591X/
- Next message: GF Mueden@: "Re: text-only version of web pages"
- Previous message: Chagnon | PubCom: "Re: text-only version of web pages"
- Next message in Thread: GF Mueden@: "Re: text-only version of web pages"
- Previous message in Thread: Chagnon | PubCom: "Re: text-only version of web pages"
- View all messages in this Thread