My concern:
When figure contains only a table element, <caption> is omitted in favor of <figcaption>.
When coding in a government environment where data tables are frequently used, I see having different ways of coding table (sometimes with caption, other time with figcaption) confusing. It might also increase the chance of having failures of accessibility.
My arguments:
- <caption> is the original element created for table titles.
- Maintaining one way of coding the table will prevent confusion when <figure> is used as a grouping element for table with footnotes.
Figure is implemented and has been in the spec for a number of years
What is your proposal for changing it?
As I said previously if you or anyone has an issue with the HTML spec please file a bug.
That way the issue can be tracked and responded to.
But please leave your attitude at the door as it is not helpful or contructive.
Regards
Stevef
On 17 May 2013, at 17:25, "Chagnon | PubCom" < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> Steve wrote: "from wikipedia:"
>
> Seriously?
> Wikipedia?
>
> Steve wrote: "as far as name clashes go, the horse has left the stable."
>
> I just spent 3 weeks at our family's horse farm.
> Seriously.
> When you do something stupid like leaving the barn door open, you go out and
> bring the horse back.
>
> -Bevi Chagnon
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> www.PubCom.com - Trainers, Consultants, Designers, Developers.
> Print, Web, Acrobat, XML, eBooks, and U.S. Federal Section 508
> Accessibility.
> New schedule for classes and workshops coming in 2013.
>
>