E-mail List Archives
Re: Proposed: a TN tag to join TH and TD?
From: Duff Johnson
Date: Jun 11, 2013 7:57AM
- Next message: Chagnon | PubCom: "Re: How do you make a someone understand the necessity of accessibility?"
- Previous message: Duff Johnson: "Re: Proposed: a TN tag to join TH and TD?"
- Next message in Thread: Keith Parks: "Re: Proposed: a TN tag to join TH and TD?"
- Previous message in Thread: Duff Johnson: "Re: Proposed: a TN tag to join TH and TD?"
- View all messages in this Thread
My apologies - I think the listserv kills attachments. Here's the screen-shot I sent in the previous mail on this subject:
http://duff-johnson.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/TN-cell-example.png
> Interesting idea, Duff.
> But what's "no-op" mean?
Sorry - blame the developers for that one!
"no-op" = no operation, or "intentionally blank".
> Just to clarify, you're describing cells that only exist to keep the table's
> column/row structure intact, not to contain data.
Exactly so.
> You're not talking about cells that:
> - have a value of 0 for the data.
> - data for that cell isn't available.
Correct, these cases would "not* be TN cases.
> - data is n/a, not appropriate for that row/column.
This one - as described - is more ambiguous. It might well be TN (see the example I sent earlier).
TN is a cell type, not whole rows/columns. Of course, you could have a row of TN cells - uninteresting from a semantic point of view, so "intentionally left blank" seems appropriate.
Duff.
- Next message: Chagnon | PubCom: "Re: How do you make a someone understand the necessity of accessibility?"
- Previous message: Duff Johnson: "Re: Proposed: a TN tag to join TH and TD?"
- Next message in Thread: Keith Parks: "Re: Proposed: a TN tag to join TH and TD?"
- Previous message in Thread: Duff Johnson: "Re: Proposed: a TN tag to join TH and TD?"
- View all messages in this Thread