E-mail List Archives
Re: FW: Javascript question
From: Alastair Campbell
Date: Aug 15, 2013 7:58AM
- Next message: Stanzel, Susan - FSA, Kansas City, MO: "proper use of the division tag"
- Previous message: Rick Hill: "FW: Javascript question"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Rick Hill: "FW: Javascript question"
- View all messages in this Thread
Rick Hill wrote:
> It is not a matter of using one or another technology, but a matter of
> using them correctly.
> Check you abide by the client-side scripting techniques for WCAG 2.0 which
> deal with recommended and disapproved scripting usages.
> Use ARIA Techniques for WCAG 2.0 to define the semantics of non-standard
> controls, they are widely supported by major browsers
>
> Does this sound like an appropriate response?
It does to me. You might add a line about "Accessibility supported"
technologies, and JavaScript is as available to people with disabilities as
the general population, therefore considered supported by user-agents.
I bookmarked Matt May's post about JavaScript for all future questions on
this topic:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2012OctDec/0223.html
I would probably also add that using 'non-standard' widgets (i.e. ones that
need ARIA) generally need more testing to ensure for compatibility and
usability across assistive technologies. (http://whatsock.com/ should save
you some time there thought.)
Hth,
-Alastair