E-mail List Archives
Re: The punctuation and typographic symbols that screen readers don't read
From: Jukka K. Korpela
Date: Jan 21, 2014 2:12PM
- Next message: Lucy Greco: "Re: The punctuation and typographic symbols that screen readers don't read"
- Previous message: Paul Bohman: "Re: The punctuation and typographic symbols that screen readers don't read"
- Next message in Thread: Lucy Greco: "Re: The punctuation and typographic symbols that screen readers don't read"
- Previous message in Thread: Paul Bohman: "Re: The punctuation and typographic symbols that screen readers don't read"
- View all messages in this Thread
2014-01-21 22:11, Paul Bohman wrote:
> Screen readers can do a lot better job at reading punctuation and
> typographic symbols. I decided to document what screen readers do and don't
> read. The results are not very encouraging.
This is important information about a sad state of affairs. Here I would
like to draw attention to just one detail in the testing:
> For example, if you write 1+1=2 (one plus one equals two), NVDA says only
> "one one two" at its default verbosity setting.
According to mathematical tradition, as well as standards including the
ISO 80000 series, there should be spacing around most operator symbols,
for example 1 + 1 = 2. This may or may not make a difference in reading,
but I think this is what should primarily be used in tests. Of course,
it might be interesting to know about reading 1+1=2, too.
Yucca
- Next message: Lucy Greco: "Re: The punctuation and typographic symbols that screen readers don't read"
- Previous message: Paul Bohman: "Re: The punctuation and typographic symbols that screen readers don't read"
- Next message in Thread: Lucy Greco: "Re: The punctuation and typographic symbols that screen readers don't read"
- Previous message in Thread: Paul Bohman: "Re: The punctuation and typographic symbols that screen readers don't read"
- View all messages in this Thread