E-mail List Archives
Re: Accordion semantics?
From: Detlev Fischer
Date: Jun 19, 2014 1:36AM
- Next message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Accordion semantics?"
- Previous message: James Nurthen: "Re: Accordion semantics?"
- Next message in Thread: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Accordion semantics?"
- Previous message in Thread: James Nurthen: "Re: Accordion semantics?"
- View all messages in this Thread
I think in cases where activating one of the tabs automatically closes the other tabs as in this Hillen example
..the semantics are quite close to the horizontal tab panels so the tablist / tab roles seem appropriate. But maybe I am missing something here.
The OpenAjax Alliance example is different in that expanded tabs stay open. For this type of accordion, using expandable regios is certainly more appropriate.
testkreis c/o feld.wald.wiese
Thedestr. 2, 22767 Hamburg
Mobil +49 (0)1577 170 73 84
Tel +49 (0)40 439 10 68-3
Fax +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5
Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites
James Nurthen schrieb am 19.06.2014 05:28:
> I agree with Bryan.
> I also find the keyboard navigation very confusing for a keyboard-only user.
> I've started telling people to code accordions as a bunch of expandable
> I'm going to raise an issue against the ARIA 1.1 Authoring Practices to
> provide an alternate pattern like this for accordions.
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Bryan Garaventa <
> <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>> Personally I've never been fond of using ARIA Tab constructs for
>> because it's impossible to tell the difference between a tab group and an
>> inline accordion, because the feedback is the same for screen reader users.
>> E.G if you have a tab group nested in an accordion, how do you know which
>> which for instance, which may be important because accordions render
>> inline whereas tabs render content after a tablist group.
>> Is there something wrong with just keeping it simple?
>> ARIA Toggles:
>> Expandable ARIA Links:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: <EMAIL REMOVED>
>> [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of Jesse Hausler
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 5:32 PM
>> To: WebAIM Discussion List
>> Subject: [WebAIM] Accordion semantics?
>> Thoughts on the best semantic for an accordion component?
>> I'm good with the keyboard and ARIA recommendations in the ARIA Authoring
>> I'm just don't care for the semantics in their only example:
>> Paired headings and divs as the way to go?
>> >> >> messages to <EMAIL REMOVED>
>> <mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> >
>> >> >> >>
> > > >