E-mail List Archives
Re: Link labels and APA citations
From: Chagnon | PubCom
Date: Oct 17, 2014 10:25PM
- Next message: Thomas McKeithan II: "Re: Improving Bootstrap’s woeful accessibi lity Daniel Nixon"
- Previous message: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net: "Re: Link labels and APA citations"
- Next message in Thread: John Foliot: "Re: Link labels and APA citations"
- Previous message in Thread: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net: "Re: Link labels and APA citations"
- View all messages in this Thread
Great comments, Karen.
Yes, the accessibility community can reach out to the "standards makers" ...
Chicago, Oxford, et al.
They should reach out to them.
And WAI/WCAG should reach out to them and bring both professional editors
into their working group (especially those with SMT/journal experience) as
well as the overseers of Chicago, Oxford, et al into the fold.
But instead of making publishers change their system that 1) has been in
place for 100+ years, 2) affects millions of publications and documents, and
3) affects everyone who publishes, why not work with them to create a better
solution than the current myopic, narrow-minded requirement currently in
WCAG?
If you attempt to change the entire publishing industry, it will be like
trying to change the direction of a cruise ship. It's such a huge entity
that change is slow, takes a lot of effort, and misses the dock most of the
time.
A better solution would have them keep their current, established methods
for publishing, and probably add something to WCAG to make links more
understandable and navigable for AT users...without changing established
publishing methods.
The current WCAG standard for "meaningful text" for hyperlinks is meaningful
only to those who are blind or have low vision and invoke keyboard shortcuts
to voice all the links on a page. Everyone else is disadvantaged, including
the fully sighted audience and the publisher, because the document now must
use convoluted language to meet WCAG.
So the end result of this standard is that it helps a minority portion of
the audience at the expense of the majority. How crazy is that! No wonder
publishers aren't buying into accessibility.
It doesn't have to be that way.
We can develop a better method, technique, guideline, standard, whatever,
that works for everyone.
But for that to happen, the accessibility community will have to work with
the publishing and advertising industries (the main communicators) to
jointly develop a truly workable solution.
These folks control all forms of communication on all topics for all
purposes. It's a waste of time to fight them. Instead, you'll accomplish
more if you join them and bring them into the fold.
- Bevi Chagnon
- PubCom.com - Trainers, Consultants, Designers, and Developers.
- Print, Web, Acrobat, XML, eBooks, and U.S. Federal Section 508
Accessibility.
- Next message: Thomas McKeithan II: "Re: Improving Bootstrap’s woeful accessibi lity Daniel Nixon"
- Previous message: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net: "Re: Link labels and APA citations"
- Next message in Thread: John Foliot: "Re: Link labels and APA citations"
- Previous message in Thread: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net: "Re: Link labels and APA citations"
- View all messages in this Thread