E-mail List Archives
Re: The official definition [of web accessibility] from theW3C is wrong
From: Michael Bullis
Date: Feb 6, 2015 7:04AM
- Next message: Tim Harshbarger: "Re: The official definition [of web accessibility] from theW3C is wrong"
- Previous message: Steve Faulkner: "The official definition [of web accessibility] from the W3C is wrong"
- Next message in Thread: Tim Harshbarger: "Re: The official definition [of web accessibility] from theW3C is wrong"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Faulkner: "The official definition [of web accessibility] from the W3C is wrong"
- View all messages in this Thread
Interesting.
Sometimes when definitions are too broad they lose practical meaning. We humans are problem solvers. Knowing that my goal that people with disabilities can use the web is very focussing. It causes me to solve problems for people with specific disabilities and leads me to specific solutions.
People using the web, on the other hand, doesn't focus me on any specific problem to solve since people can already use the web. What people? My brain says, do you mean Spanish speaking people? Do you mean people with mobile devices? Children?
Mike Bullis,
Executive director,
The IMAGE Center of Maryland
- Next message: Tim Harshbarger: "Re: The official definition [of web accessibility] from theW3C is wrong"
- Previous message: Steve Faulkner: "The official definition [of web accessibility] from the W3C is wrong"
- Next message in Thread: Tim Harshbarger: "Re: The official definition [of web accessibility] from theW3C is wrong"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Faulkner: "The official definition [of web accessibility] from the W3C is wrong"
- View all messages in this Thread