E-mail List Archives
Re: Frames
From: Andrew Kirkpatrick
Date: Feb 8, 2003 4:43AM
- Next message: Terence de Giere: "Re: Frames"
- Previous message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Frames"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Frames"
- View all messages in this Thread
Sure, as long as the name is intelligible. I think that too often we get name="frm_01_top" because people
assume that the title takes care of all situations -- and maybe it should, but it doesn't.
AWK
>Making them identical could disappoint users who can access both
>NAME and TITLE and who have heard or seen the NAME but found it too
>cryptic and wish to check what the TITLE says. Due to the uses of NAME for
>other purposes (e.g., in TARGET attributes), it needs to be relatively
>short; TITLE can used to give a more verbose explanation.
>
>Cf. to http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-HTML-TECHS/#frame-text-equivalent
>which contains examples like
> <FRAME src="sitenavbar.html" name="navbar"
> title="Sitewide navigation bar" ...>
>
Andrew
--
Andrew Kirkpatrick
CPB/WGBH National Center for Accessible Media
125 Western Ave.
Boston, MA 02134
E-mail: <EMAIL REMOVED>
Web site: ncam.wgbh.org
----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
- Next message: Terence de Giere: "Re: Frames"
- Previous message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Frames"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Frames"
- View all messages in this Thread