E-mail List Archives
Re: Placeholder text contrast
From: Andrew Kirkpatrick
Date: Mar 20, 2015 11:46AM
- Next message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Placeholder text contrast"
- Previous message: Meacham, Steve - FSA, Kansas City, MO: "Re: sample ADA statement for website?"
- Next message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Placeholder text contrast"
- Previous message in Thread: Jesse Hausler: "Placeholder text contrast"
- View all messages in this Thread
Jesse,
The WCAG group added a note to this effect (http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/visual-audio-contrast-contrast.html) in a recent update to the understanding document, which reads:
Note 3: The minimum contrast success criterion (1.4.3) applies to text in the page, and placeholder text is text in the page. If used, placeholder text needs to provide sufficient contrast.
It is of course a little ironic that usability tests indicate that people think that the field is already completed when the contrast is high enough, since misunderstanding a control as being already filled out can happen when a screen reader user encounters a control with placeholder text.
Have your usability studies found a definite benefit to having placeholder text at all?
AWK
- Next message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Placeholder text contrast"
- Previous message: Meacham, Steve - FSA, Kansas City, MO: "Re: sample ADA statement for website?"
- Next message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Placeholder text contrast"
- Previous message in Thread: Jesse Hausler: "Placeholder text contrast"
- View all messages in this Thread