E-mail List Archives
Re: Name, Role, Value and Labels or Instructions techniques...
From: Léonie Watson
Date: Mar 31, 2015 6:47AM
- Next message: Moore,Michael (DARS): "Re: Name, Role, Value and Labels or Instructions techniques..."
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Name, Role, Value and Labels or Instructions techniques..."
- Next message in Thread: Moore,Michael (DARS): "Re: Name, Role, Value and Labels or Instructions techniques..."
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Name, Role, Value and Labels or Instructions techniques..."
- View all messages in this Thread
" So with the new document, 4.1.2 and 3.3.2 success criterion, in a way, contradict each other. Part of me ask why list something that can be done.
but really should not be done?"
I don't think they do contradict each other do they? 4.2.2 requires that a thing has an accessible name, 3.2.2 requires that it has a visible label. You can meet both in one go using the <label> element, or you can meet them separately using the title attribute and a different visual label. It's just different ways to get to the same outcome.
Léonie.
--
@LeonieWatson Tink.UK Carpe diem
- Next message: Moore,Michael (DARS): "Re: Name, Role, Value and Labels or Instructions techniques..."
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Name, Role, Value and Labels or Instructions techniques..."
- Next message in Thread: Moore,Michael (DARS): "Re: Name, Role, Value and Labels or Instructions techniques..."
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Name, Role, Value and Labels or Instructions techniques..."
- View all messages in this Thread