E-mail List Archives
Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without <body>, etc?
From: Jared Smith
Date: Apr 21, 2015 11:18AM
- Next message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- Previous message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- Next message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Faulkner: "Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- View all messages in this Thread
Duff Johnson wrote:
> what's the minimum required for (notionally) HTML content in order to meet WCAG 2.0?
The following would be fully HTML5 and WCAG conformant:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<title>Page Title</title>
<p>Content</p>
Jared
- Next message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- Previous message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- Next message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Faulkner: "Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- View all messages in this Thread