E-mail List Archives
Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without <body>, etc?
From: Andrew Kirkpatrick
Date: Apr 21, 2015 2:20PM
- Next message: Mike Warner: "lang attribute for foreign words found in Merriam Webster's dictionary?"
- Previous message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- Next message in Thread: Weissenberger, Todd M: "Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without, etc?"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Faulkner: "Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- View all messages in this Thread
That's why valid code automatically passes 4.1.1, but code with validation issues require that authors do the work to make sure that content reads correctly. Authors cannot assume, they need to verify.
Of course, valid code simplifies conformance with 4.1.1 greatly.
AWK
- Next message: Mike Warner: "lang attribute for foreign words found in Merriam Webster's dictionary?"
- Previous message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- Next message in Thread: Weissenberger, Todd M: "Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without, etc?"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Faulkner: "Re: Can HTML tagged content conform to WCAG 2.0 without , etc?"
- View all messages in this Thread