E-mail List Archives
Re: Am I understanding aria-relevant="removals" correctly?
From: Robert Fentress
Date: May 29, 2015 7:28AM
- Next message: Strange, Lainie: "JAWS and browser pdf plug-ins"
- Previous message: Robert Fentress: "Re: Am I understanding aria-relevant="removals" correctly?"
- Next message in Thread: Bryan Garaventa: "Re: Am I understanding aria-relevant="removals" correctly?"
- Previous message in Thread: Robert Fentress: "Re: Am I understanding aria-relevant="removals" correctly?"
- View all messages in this Thread
Yes, _mallory, I eventually understood what they were getting at. It just
didn't strike me as intuitive initially. Like you said, I'm sure it made
sense in the context they were coming from.
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:46 AM, _mallory < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
>
> Actually, the word atom means "not-cuttable". Tomos, to slice, with the
> negating "a" in front of it.
> The word originally meant "the smallest unbreakable single unit", so
> aria-atomic would mean "everything in this aria-atomic box is a single
> unbreakable unit." Yeah, atoms were so named before we discovered
> sub-atomic particles, meaning atoms are now poorly named. But hey,
> starfish aren't fish either :P
>
> _mallory
> > > > >
--
Robert Fentress
Senior Accessibility Solutions Designer
540.231.1255
Technology-enhanced Learning & Online Strategies
Assistive Technologies
1180 Torgersen Hall
620 Drillfield Drive (0434)
Blacksburg, Virginia 24061
- Next message: Strange, Lainie: "JAWS and browser pdf plug-ins"
- Previous message: Robert Fentress: "Re: Am I understanding aria-relevant="removals" correctly?"
- Next message in Thread: Bryan Garaventa: "Re: Am I understanding aria-relevant="removals" correctly?"
- Previous message in Thread: Robert Fentress: "Re: Am I understanding aria-relevant="removals" correctly?"
- View all messages in this Thread