WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: Browser zooming sufficient for WCAG 1.4.4 (resize text)

for

From: EA Draffan
Date: Jun 3, 2015 1:01PM

I have to agree total zoom is not ideal for all users. For those who have reading difficulties and do not need image zoom, just increasing the size of text can be enormously helpful. This is also critical for reading skills when coping with cursive texts such as Arabic, which also has no capitals. We have this attribute as part of ATbar (https://www.atbar.org/) because of the trend of browsers to just offer total zoom. Increasing line spacing can also help some readers.

Best wishes
E.A.

Mrs E.A. Draffan
WAIS, ECS , University of Southampton
Mobile +44 (0)7976 289103
http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk
UK AAATE rep http://www.aaate.net/
http://www.emptech.info

-----Original Message-----
From: WebAIM-Forum [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of Iaffaldano, Michelangelo
Sent: 03 June 2015 19:41
To: Eades, Terri; 'Robert Fentress'; WebAIM Discussion List
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Browser zooming sufficient for WCAG 1.4.4 (resize text)

It is a common misconception that page zooming has made the earlier recommendation for relative units obsolete. In usability testing I observed users with limited vision who still enlarge the font without zooming the page, in hopes of minimizing horizontal scrolling, which is so disorienting.

Michelangelo

-----Original Message-----
From: Eades, Terri [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ]
Sent: June-02-15 6:43 PM
To: 'Robert Fentress'; WebAIM Discussion List
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Browser zooming sufficient for WCAG 1.4.4 (resize text)

I think the "px vs. em" debate was born when responsive design was because fonts defined in px will NOT scale with the size the screen, therefore creating a usability problem because it can make reading difficult if your font is too big or too small for the screen you're on. It's not an accessibility issue in the traditional sense, but since good usability often results in better accessibility, I tend to lean on going with em's.


Terri Eades
Webmaster

Morgan Community College
920 Barlow Road, Fort Morgan, CO 80701
Phone: (970) 542-3155 | Fax: (970) 542-3115 <EMAIL REMOVED>

www.MorganCC.edu







-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Fentress [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 6:51 AM
To: WebAIM Discussion List
Subject: [WebAIM] Browser zooming sufficient for WCAG 1.4.4 (resize text)

I am confused as to the guidance given in the techniques for meeting or failing to meet WCAG success criteria 1.4.4 (resize text) <http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/#visual-audio-contrast-scale>;.
I wonder if somebody could clarify best practice for me. While WCAG 1.0 seemed clear in its guidance forbidding font sizing with absolute units, WCAG 2 seems more vague, simply stating that text should be able to be resized 200% without loss of content or functionality.

What is unclear is whether the, now ubiquitous, browser page zoom functionality means that units like px are acceptable, since text whose size is defined this way will scale along with the entirety of the page.
If you just want to enlarge the text, independent of its containing elements, however, you will not be able to do so (at least with native
functionality) if absolute units are used. To me, relying on zoom capability to handle text resizing seems insufficient, because it often necessitates horizontal scrolling (a problem for my father who has low vision and boosts font size). That seems to be acceptable from the perspective of WCAG 2, though, since a sufficient technique for 1.4.4 is "G142:
Using a technology that has commonly-available user agents that support zoom <http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20140916/G142>;". I've seen this discussed different places on the web, but people seem to have different perspectives on whether it is okay. WebAIM, at least, thinks "it is not vital that text sizes be defined in relative sizes."
<http://webaim.org/techniques/fonts/#font_size>;

What do you folks think?

Best,
Rob

--
Robert Fentress
Senior Accessibility Solutions Designer
540.231.1255

Technology-enhanced Learning & Online Strategies Assistive Technologies
1180 Torgersen Hall
620 Drillfield Drive (0434)
Blacksburg, Virginia 24061


This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. Unless otherwise stated, opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and are not endorsed by the author's employer.

Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Sauf indication contraire, les opinions exprimées dans le présent message sont celles de l'auteur et ne sont pas avalisées par l'employeur de l'auteur.