E-mail List Archives
Re: Bypass Blocks for Keyboard users
From: Steve Sawczyn
Date: Jul 15, 2015 12:28PM
- Next message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Bypass Blocks for Keyboard users"
- Previous message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Bypass Blocks for Keyboard users"
- Next message in Thread: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Bypass Blocks for Keyboard users"
- Previous message in Thread: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Bypass Blocks for Keyboard users"
- View all messages in this Thread
I realize this is very controversial, but I still lean toward calling a 2.4.1 violation if a skip link isn't present. My reasoning is that while the techniques don't specifically address keyboard users, I feel it's not in the spirit of WCAG to call for a mechanism that can't be used by the user base most highly impacted. Sure browsers could and should add keyboard support for landmark/heading navigation, but until that's a reality, we have real users with real barriers with no real solution other than to say that the "mechanism" actually should be considered to be functionality and hence available to keyboard users.
Steve
- Next message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Bypass Blocks for Keyboard users"
- Previous message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Bypass Blocks for Keyboard users"
- Next message in Thread: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Bypass Blocks for Keyboard users"
- Previous message in Thread: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Bypass Blocks for Keyboard users"
- View all messages in this Thread