E-mail List Archives
Re: Where does invisible link text fail WCAG2?
From: Jared Smith
Date: Jul 20, 2015 10:18AM
- Next message: Lynn Holdsworth: "Tiny clickable element: does this fail WCAG2?"
- Previous message: Moore,Michael (HHSC): "Re: Where does invisible link text fail WCAG2?"
- Next message in Thread: Lynn Holdsworth: "Re: Where does invisible link text fail WCAG2?"
- Previous message in Thread: Moore,Michael (HHSC): "Re: Where does invisible link text fail WCAG2?"
- View all messages in this Thread
Lynn Holdsworth wrote:
> Where (if at all) does this one fail WCAG2? Feels like it should be an
> info and relationships or a labels issue, but I can'tfind a specific
> criterion to fail it under.
These types of statements always cause me concern. If you can't find a
WCAG failure would it not be documented as an issue? It's clearly an
accessibility and usability issue and should be noted as such even if
it isn't a WCAG failure.
Remember that WCAG only deals with accessibility for users with
disabilities - if something's inaccessible to nearly everyone (as is
the case with invisible link text), then it's not a WCAG failure. This
is why things like white text on a white background (at Level A), 1
pixel sized text, entirely ambiguous link text (such as "here"), etc.
are not WCAG failures, even though they are all significant
accessibility and usability issues.
Jared
- Next message: Lynn Holdsworth: "Tiny clickable element: does this fail WCAG2?"
- Previous message: Moore,Michael (HHSC): "Re: Where does invisible link text fail WCAG2?"
- Next message in Thread: Lynn Holdsworth: "Re: Where does invisible link text fail WCAG2?"
- Previous message in Thread: Moore,Michael (HHSC): "Re: Where does invisible link text fail WCAG2?"
- View all messages in this Thread