E-mail List Archives
Re: PDF accessibility
From: Karlen Communications
Date: Oct 31, 2015 11:20AM
- Next message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: PDF accessibility"
- Previous message: lcmcevoy: "Re: PDF accessibility"
- Next message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: PDF accessibility"
- Previous message in Thread: lcmcevoy: "Re: PDF accessibility"
- View all messages in this Thread
My list would be the same but I would add that the form controls must be accessible.
Be aware that in order for the form controls to be accessible, once you've built the accessibility into the form controls/fields themselves, you THEN Tag the document. You don't add form controls/fields to an already tagged PDF. If you are using a Word document as a template, this is the ONLY time you use Print to PDF to create an untagged PDF. You open the untagged PDF in acrobat Pro and begin adding the form controls. (Unless the document is a scanned document, in which case you perform the text recognition first.)
Here is the hierarchy of tasks that Adobe established years ago and I advocate that clients use:
1. Is the PDF a scanned document? If yes, perform Text Recognition.
2. Is the PDF document a fillable form? If yes, then add the "accessible" form controls/fields.
3. Does the PDF document have links? If yes, then use the Create Links from URL's tools and the Links tool to add them.
4. Does the PDF document have multimedia? If yes, then add the multimedia. I would add that the multimedia itself must be accessible and.
Only THEN do you add Tags to the document and then go through the remediation and/or Quality Assurance process. So the list of basics for the document are the same, but since you are adding another element, the form controls/fields also have to be accessible .
From: WebAIM-Forum [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of lcmcevoy
Sent: October 31, 2015 11:05 AM
To: WebAIM Discussion List < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] PDF accessibility
What would your list be if it was PDF forms?
On Oct 30, 2015, at 10:54 AM, Duff Johnson < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>> I am working on making PDFs from my organisation more accessible. As we have a very large amount of documents, I would like to make sure of what is really mandatory to help visually impared, and what isn't. So far, I think that the 5 elements listed below are the most important. Does anyone thinks we are missing something really important?
>> - Define title of document and show it
>> - Define heading titles
>> - Mark background images as background
>> - Links from real words, and not "click here"
>> - Image alt text
>> Thank you very much for your opinion.
> Off-the-cuff, if I was to make a list of the 5 âmost importantâ things, and assuming these are documents and not forms, the list might look more like:
> 1 Ensure PDF documents are tagged
> 2 Ensure all semantically significant content is tagged
> 3 Ensure the tags are in the correct logical reading order
> 4 Ensure the tags are semantically correct
> 5 Ensure content tagged as <Figure> includes alternative text, or
> ActualText, as appropriate
> > > archives at http://webaim.org/discussion/archives