E-mail List Archives
Re: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern?
From: Pratik Patel
Date: Mar 29, 2016 1:02AM
- Next message: John Hicks: "Re: Opening modal window without user action"
- Previous message: Kelly Lupo: "Re: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern?"
- Next message in Thread: Joy Relton: "Re: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern?"
- Previous message in Thread: Kelly Lupo: "Re: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern?"
- View all messages in this Thread
Hello Geri,
Let me preface the following remarks by saying that I'm not an attorney and what I say does not, in any way, constitute a legal advice. EZFire's legal team has come across several instances where similar circumstances required us to provide legal advice. We have used similar thinking to what appears below. But, your circumstance and the specific situation will guide the specific steps you will need to take.
Here are a couple of points to keep in mind. Others on this thread have correctly pointed out that your institution choosing this product does make your institution liable for a complaint or a law suit depending on the type of institution you work for. This is doubly the case considering the fact that your institution would be granting an exemption based on foreknowledge that the product is not accessible.
In order to do your due diligence, you should identify and consider other vendors who have similar functions to what you're seeking and whose accessibility story is much better than the vendor you're considering at the moment.
What has this vendor said about making the product accessible even though it is not accessible at the moment? Consider a strategy that does not take the vendor off the hook completely. In fact, you are in a good position to demand full accessibility. Rather than providing an outright exemption, you can impose an accelerated remediation timeline and monitor the implementation of such a timeline.
There is also the question of implementation. If your institution is set on using this vendor, delay the implementation as much as possible so that you can take care of what I suggested above. Be sure to include testing for accessibility. Unless the need is absolutely dire, which I highly doubt, a six to twelve month delay will not significantly impact your institution's operation. If the product is complicated, this might not work since twelve months may not be enough for them to test and remediate their product. They can choose to work with an outside consulting firm--sorry for the self-serving note--to make sure that this happens within the timeline you set.
These are considerations based on the limited knowledge I have about your current circumstance. Please feel free to contact me privately should you need to discuss this further.
Pratik Patel
Founder and CEO, EZFire
M: 718-249-7019
E: <EMAIL REMOVED> (or <EMAIL REMOVED> )
Follow me on Twitter: @ppatel
Follow me on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/pratik-patel/9/985/882
Skype: Patel.pratik
- Next message: John Hicks: "Re: Opening modal window without user action"
- Previous message: Kelly Lupo: "Re: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern?"
- Next message in Thread: Joy Relton: "Re: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern?"
- Previous message in Thread: Kelly Lupo: "Re: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern?"
- View all messages in this Thread