E-mail List Archives
Re: Headings: requirements vs best practices
From: Alan Zaitchik
Date: Jun 22, 2016 7:16PM
- Next message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: FW: non-underlined link - will bolding meet contrast requirement?"
- Previous message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Modal close button not focusable; ESC works"
- Next message in Thread: Ryan E. Benson: "Re: Headings: requirements vs best practices"
- Previous message in Thread: Srinivasu Chakravarthula: "Re: Headings: requirements vs best practices"
- View all messages in this Thread
Thank you to all who responded.
I guess there is both good and bad news for me in this thread. The bad
news is that I have been telling developers, incorrectly it turns out,
that we must have exactly one H1 on a page and that we cannot ³skip²
heading levels. I did this because the tools I have used for testing
accessibility have insisted on these requirements, both the ³Accessibility
Inspector² plugin for Firefox, which is more explicitly WCAG 2.0 oriented,
as well as the Firefox Accessibility Extension, which seems to me rather
like the Web Accessibility Toolbar I have used with IE. From what this
thread makes clear, there are no such requirements.
The good news, I guess, is that my insistence on these ³best practices"
for headings has in fact probably made the pages more accessible! Isn¹t
that our goal, anyway?
But it makes me wonder about all the other rules used by the AInspector
and Firefox Accessibility Extension and other tools, e.g. ARIA rules about
landmarks, roles, etc. We sometimes have to do contortions to avoid
nesting two <nav> sections one inside another (or, equivalently, placing a
DIV with a role of navigation inside another such DIV). Is this another
³false positive² of the AInspector which we should ignore? And so on.
A
On 6/22/16, 9:23 AM, "Srinivasu Chakravarthula" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
wrote:
>I completely agree.
>
>Regards,
>
>Srinivasu Chakravarthula - Twitter: http://twitter.com/CSrinivasu/
>Website: http://www.srinivasu.org | http://serveominclusion.com
>
>Let's create an inclusive web!
>
>Lead Accessibility Consultant, Informatica
>Hon. Joint Secretary, The National Association for the Blind, Karnataka
>Branch
>
>On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Marc Solomon < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
>wrote:
>
>> In my opinion, placing the contents of the first <h1> before the
>> owner/publisher information in the page title would be preferred from a
>> usability perspective. Doing so would allow a screen reader user to
>> identify the purpose of the page more quickly. Hope this is an option
>>for
>> your project.
>> Best,
>> Marc
>>
>>
- Next message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: FW: non-underlined link - will bolding meet contrast requirement?"
- Previous message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Modal close button not focusable; ESC works"
- Next message in Thread: Ryan E. Benson: "Re: Headings: requirements vs best practices"
- Previous message in Thread: Srinivasu Chakravarthula: "Re: Headings: requirements vs best practices"
- View all messages in this Thread